On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 2:48 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 02 May 2022 08:24:28 +0100,
> Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Yosry,
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 08:11:31PM +0000, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > > Count the pages used by KVM in arm64 for stage2 mmu in secondary
> pagetable
> > > stats.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > >  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > > index 53ae2c0640bc..fc5030307cce 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > > @@ -92,9 +92,13 @@ static bool kvm_is_device_pfn(unsigned long pfn)
> > >  static void *stage2_memcache_zalloc_page(void *arg)
> > >  {
> > >     struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc = arg;
> > > +   void *virt;
> > >
> > >     /* Allocated with __GFP_ZERO, so no need to zero */
> > > -   return kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(mc);
> > > +   virt = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(mc);
> > > +   if (virt)
> > > +           kvm_account_pgtable_pages(virt, +1);
> >
> > Sorry I didn't say it last time around, would now be a good time to
> > clean up the funky sign convention of kvm_mod_used_mmu_pages()? Or limit
> > the funk to just x86 :)
>
> Indeed. I pointed this out in my initial review of this series, and
> expected these to be gone by now.


Hey everyone,

Sorry about that. Will clean that up in the next version.


>
>         M.
>
> --
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
>