From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guo Ren Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 17:18:59 +0800 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 15/15] package/gcc: enable gcc 9.1 for ork1 (openrisc) In-Reply-To: <20190714084056.GI2680@scaer> References: <20190620100725.105587-1-giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com> <20190620100725.105587-16-giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com> <54fe6b56-aa43-b657-0b8e-1c42e2471735@mind.be> <20190714084056.GI2680@scaer> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 4:41 PM Yann E. MORIN wrote: > > Guo, All, > > On 2019-07-14 07:57 +0800, Guo Ren spake thusly: > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 5:24 AM Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > > > On 20/06/2019 12:07, Giulio Benetti wrote: > > > > openrisc support has been added with gcc 9.1. > > > > Keep for now the old gcc 5 fork for ork1. > > > So, when will we remove this? > > > Same for ARC (GCC 8.x fork) and C-SKY (GCC 6.x fork): they are available in > > > GCC9, do we need to keep those old forks? > > Keep the fork for C-SKY, the upstream of csky backend in gcc9 only > > support abiv2. > > As far as I can see, we have no way to choose the ABI in Buildroot. > So, what would we loose by keeping only gcc-9? See package/Makefile.in # For C-SKY abiv1 & abiv2 ifeq ($(BR2_csky),y) ifeq ($(BR2_ck610),y) ABI = abiv1 else ABI = abiv2 endif endif gcc-9 don't support 610. -- Best Regards Guo Ren ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/