From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
"Tyler Retzlaff" <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>,
"Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal: fix return type of bsf safe functions
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 21:41:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8x3bxq00D7eMej29sjMw_whQOoGjfTCXoaTjEYHs9pFOg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221005154036.4187143-1-thomas@monjalon.net>
On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 5:41 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> In a recent commit, changing return type from int to uint32_t,
> I did a last minute change to functions rte_bsf32_safe and rte_bsf64_safe,
> because thought they were forgotten.
> Actually these functions are returning 0 or 1, so it should be int.
> The return type is reverted to the original type for these 2 functions.
>
> Fixes: 4b81c145ae37 ("eal: change return type of bsf/fls functions")
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Reviewed-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-05 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-10 23:24 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: propose correction rte_bsf64 return type declaration Tyler Retzlaff
2021-03-15 19:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: propose correction rte_{bsf, fls} inline functions type use Tyler Retzlaff
2021-10-25 19:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-26 7:45 ` Morten Brørup
2021-11-11 4:15 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-11-11 11:54 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-11 12:41 ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-11 14:07 ` Jerin Jacob
2022-07-13 10:13 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-07-18 21:28 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-08-08 21:21 ` [PATCH 0/3] cleanup bsf and fls inline function return types Tyler Retzlaff
2022-08-08 21:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] doc: announce cleanup of rte_{bsf, fls} inline functions type use Tyler Retzlaff
2022-10-05 9:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-08-08 21:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] eal: change rte_fls and rte_bsf to return uint32_t Tyler Retzlaff
2022-10-05 9:02 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-05 15:15 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-10-05 15:23 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-05 15:40 ` [PATCH] eal: fix return type of bsf safe functions Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-05 19:41 ` David Marchand [this message]
2022-10-05 22:20 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-10-06 0:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-06 18:20 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-08-08 21:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] test: fix sign compare warning for rte_bsf64 return type change Tyler Retzlaff
2022-08-08 21:42 ` [PATCH 0/3] cleanup bsf and fls inline function return types Stephen Hemminger
2022-08-09 8:26 ` Morten Brørup
2022-10-05 10:11 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJFAV8x3bxq00D7eMej29sjMw_whQOoGjfTCXoaTjEYHs9pFOg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.