From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D317C282DA for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:49:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EDAB218FD for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:49:25 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7EDAB218FD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dev-bounces@dpdk.org Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 474501BBA1; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:49:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-vs1-f67.google.com (mail-vs1-f67.google.com [209.85.217.67]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54221BB2E for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:49:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-vs1-f67.google.com with SMTP id s11so2718545vsn.0 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 03:49:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/fk+yftunhSADVFawKY3Qy7LVndqK3hkPM2D8zJalq4=; b=BQVrctjoZj5PFWByhCeWXfUQw0mDn5Fgk5MAmeHfFJH1mE7b9uS5UfXkDrvaS5Wr/j UzV2mCpn6VoL5wrw6chhYPX6F1BcVMYOlFWvWsxban24ravm36gkMnAbHdjakuU90G7q 8gFVZQPpmBgQQZcQ45Fu4pohGrldnzIsI5/Oi91wJ43UffC7CBs+dczbapiXxvvkLnVA nFuIOrRrmZm1EHfZVIlX8T4NGl2fljPjEa2eNfx+AyDe9ZizIZNMFIGeJ/pfhNVhmLhb a7yGGv5A6felOklVNQiJ7uIdG5hB/oZ9kskfjwNB6X49PYCrPNxU1cIAS6g7LgrfMAgq QxLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXF/efTtoMN2tUhLmbpNxknT6zSdrXGlwp3Hh0KY0BnFJqq2Nd5 mi4a9K+QDtF/4fF/iRTCWeX5YO04JiWoj76XwBKPfw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyNo6r94gAIIIngvpklGPM+3kb7SgKbrvj8ZvNRAuLQ2xyj+H1BfVJlFTKoRlUj4OOH/8SbQ+YdJb0f1CNO+hA= X-Received: by 2002:a67:eb57:: with SMTP id x23mr1662284vso.39.1555670961988; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 03:49:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1555667827-3715-1-git-send-email-tomaszx.jozwiak@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1555667827-3715-1-git-send-email-tomaszx.jozwiak@intel.com> From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:49:10 +0200 Message-ID: To: Tomasz Jozwiak Cc: dev , "Trahe, Fiona" , Yongseok Koh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test/compress: fix max mbuf size test case X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 11:57 AM Tomasz Jozwiak wrote: > Fixed the compilation error on gcc (GCC) > 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-28) > > Fixes: 355b02eedc65 ("test/compress: add max mbuf size test case") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Jozwiak > --- > app/test/test_compressdev.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/app/test/test_compressdev.c b/app/test/test_compressdev.c > index 404b98f..603eeea 100644 > --- a/app/test/test_compressdev.c > +++ b/app/test/test_compressdev.c > @@ -1948,6 +1948,7 @@ test_compressdev_deflate_stateless_dynamic_big(void) > struct comp_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params; > uint16_t i = 0; > int ret = TEST_SUCCESS; > + int j = 0; > Useless initialisation. const struct rte_compressdev_capabilities *capab; > char *test_buffer = NULL; > > @@ -1989,8 +1990,8 @@ test_compressdev_deflate_stateless_dynamic_big(void) > > /* fill the buffer with data based on rand. data */ > srand(BIG_DATA_TEST_SIZE); > - for (uint32_t i = 0; i < BIG_DATA_TEST_SIZE - 1; ++i) > - test_buffer[i] = (uint8_t)(rand() % ((uint8_t)-1)) | 1; > + for (j = 0; j < BIG_DATA_TEST_SIZE - 1; ++j) > + test_buffer[j] = (uint8_t)(rand() % ((uint8_t)-1)) | 1; > > test_buffer[BIG_DATA_TEST_SIZE-1] = 0; > int_data.buf_idx = &i; > -- > 2.7.4 > Tested-by: David Marchand -- David Marchand