All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: "Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)" <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
	"bruce.richardson@intel.com" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] spinlock: move the implementation to arm specific file
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 16:59:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8zYt0iVaEdN8OKAJqtvcn895z1RQsOzv1U5=KKhE6=WFQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM6PR08MB3160488FB3CF38796B67A2308FBF0@AM6PR08MB3160.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 4:58 PM Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China) <
Gavin.Hu@arm.com> wrote:

>
> > This change breaks the use of intrinsics in x86 case at least.
>
> This is true, if intrinsics is still an option for x86 even not is use by
> default.
> I will fix this in v2.
>

Please, also check ppc, same pb afaics.
Thanks.

-- 
David Marchand

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-20 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-20 10:42 [PATCH v1 0/5] spinlock optimization and test case enhancements Gavin Hu
2018-12-20 10:42 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] test/spinlock: remove 1us delay for correct spinlock benchmarking Gavin Hu
2018-12-20 10:42 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] test/spinlock: get timestamp more precisely Gavin Hu
2018-12-20 10:42 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] test/spinlock: amortize the cost of getting time Gavin Hu
2018-12-20 10:42 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] spinlock: move the implementation to arm specific file Gavin Hu
2018-12-20 12:47   ` David Marchand
2018-12-20 12:55     ` David Marchand
2018-12-20 14:40       ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-12-20 14:36     ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-12-20 15:09       ` David Marchand
2018-12-20 15:58         ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-12-20 15:59           ` David Marchand [this message]
2018-12-20 10:42 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] spinlock: reimplement with atomic one-way barrier builtins Gavin Hu
2018-12-20 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] spinlock optimization and test case enhancements Gavin Hu
2018-12-20 17:42   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] test/spinlock: remove 1us delay for correct benchmarking Gavin Hu
2018-12-20 17:42   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] test/spinlock: get timestamp more precisely Gavin Hu
2018-12-20 17:42   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] test/spinlock: amortize the cost of getting time Gavin Hu
2018-12-20 17:42   ` [PATCH v2 4/5] spinlock: reimplement with atomic one-way barrier builtins Gavin Hu
2018-12-20 17:42   ` [PATCH v2 5/5] eal: fix clang compilation error on x86 Gavin Hu
2019-01-15  7:54 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] spinlock optimization and test case enhancements gavin hu
2019-01-15  7:54 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] eal: fix clang compilation error on x86 gavin hu
2019-01-15  7:54 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] test/spinlock: remove 1us delay for correct benchmarking gavin hu
2019-01-15  7:54 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] test/spinlock: amortize the cost of getting time gavin hu
2019-01-15  7:54 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] spinlock: reimplement with atomic one-way barrier builtins gavin hu
2019-01-15 10:32 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] spinlock optimization and test case enhancements gavin hu
2019-01-15 10:32 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] eal: fix clang compilation error on x86 gavin hu
2019-01-15 17:42   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-01-15 10:32 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] test/spinlock: remove 1us delay for correct benchmarking gavin hu
2019-01-15 10:32 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] test/spinlock: amortize the cost of getting time gavin hu
2019-01-15 10:32 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] spinlock: reimplement with atomic one-way barrier builtins gavin hu
2019-03-08  7:16 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] generic spinlock optimization and test case enhancements Gavin Hu
2019-03-08  7:16 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] test/spinlock: dealy 1 us to create contention Gavin Hu
2019-03-08  7:16 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] test/spinlock: amortize the cost of getting time Gavin Hu
2019-03-08  7:16 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] spinlock: reimplement with atomic one-way barrier builtins Gavin Hu
2019-03-08  7:37 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] generic spinlock optimization and test case enhancements Gavin Hu
2019-03-08  7:37 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] test/spinlock: remove 1us delay for correct benchmarking Gavin Hu
2019-03-08  7:37 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] test/spinlock: amortize the cost of getting time Gavin Hu
2019-03-08  7:37 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] spinlock: reimplement with atomic one-way barrier builtins Gavin Hu
2019-03-08  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] generic spinlock optimization and test case enhancements Gavin Hu
2019-03-11 12:21   ` Nipun Gupta
2019-03-15 12:21   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-28  7:47   ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-08  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] test/spinlock: remove 1us delay for correct benchmarking Gavin Hu
2019-03-08  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] test/spinlock: amortize the cost of getting time Gavin Hu
2019-03-08  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] spinlock: reimplement with atomic one-way barrier builtins Gavin Hu
2019-03-12 14:53   ` [EXT] " Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-03-14  0:31     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-14  2:36       ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-14 14:22   ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJFAV8zYt0iVaEdN8OKAJqtvcn895z1RQsOzv1U5=KKhE6=WFQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=Gavin.Hu@arm.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.