From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF2FC433F5 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 08:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3124160E08 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 08:07:32 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 3124160E08 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dpdk.org Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E24F40150; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:07:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B539F40142 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:07:29 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1634717249; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0xY4KH0ULgZuJZyF3aEyj76Rm+JgPiUF6YDYax5h9r0=; b=CL6v7Ju/qSzbb8JHs24UWqsYisMEE47xRu7JKXRkeOvIBO+Kg6uiH1zAed02SGUa1WwQeX 7qbR1qyfB9/WRP3TsiQE9qWFAKgwmf9BmqG8sgD96YSa5y4iU9ZVZgp8JU0R/CEVEFrE6B ri7X/HYJ/55Tvv4BaA0bzU/TcdWQnrU= Received: from mail-lf1-f72.google.com (mail-lf1-f72.google.com [209.85.167.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-592-LlwwoJPgMTO1nzw66QDa8A-1; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 04:07:28 -0400 X-MC-Unique: LlwwoJPgMTO1nzw66QDa8A-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f72.google.com with SMTP id z29-20020a195e5d000000b003fd437f0e07so2761032lfi.20 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 01:07:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0xY4KH0ULgZuJZyF3aEyj76Rm+JgPiUF6YDYax5h9r0=; b=NBCdePtx+yw9COZh1HuCb4tIiWln5GFJGF/9SPXqmkEpjMpPSk/vtEYXVdZJajfUDK Bgt8XiqE/ycO969ci5iJn1iLL8IqFSS5mYX1d5QK8y09qMdvS5NPp6+SmEFSNuCsCxCm /OJqLH5txtLf+c1A1oSIBzCdNUvudkcnEbfwBoIuhKPw5strKfEOjf6SCP7t+bvDOY79 cpwXcOrm5a9PN8BhfEGBM25mvSpBWQvWsCQtIu69KvJsBOZttcxSg+uI+3QLGgRW2F3B a7Xv3C/bYJkwwT8jLJJbzgAqZsMMi1MP6KNeHQnAEWLKsP0EB+B74WbBFKlU+m1xOog0 g/7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5315TuFSrcszgS6qz2VH2r/ez5vkk+3HWeB6MnKFayIckxNWCHfd W22LTJu+UjJ1Tpe46jA2/OI+6H5IcM4LhXh/6QuBfWEn2zNvXAO0SzOq/9W8Qx0DxS/ZIOQv2dB mDVSPJFH4pIBNM092p84= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:202a:: with SMTP id s10mr10393302lfs.560.1634717246445; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 01:07:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzZpa7ZVx7Ig1d0/grXU9M3jdx3YRkAJxggFMBFLJh5Vfpn+BAkh6VoYPKAXjFmkig5Ko7gLDrxEZ2CAvGi3yc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:202a:: with SMTP id s10mr10393283lfs.560.1634717246274; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 01:07:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211018144907.1145028-1-andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru> <20211019174022.2036272-1-andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:07:15 +0200 Message-ID: To: Andrew Rybchenko Cc: Olivier Matz , dev Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] mempool: cleanup namespace X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 9:52 AM Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > > Thanks for the quick rebase. > > I had rebased v2 before Olivier comments. > > I spotted a little issue diffing with your v3 (see comment on patch > > 2), and fixed your v3 in a local branch of mine. > > It passes my checks. > > > > I'll wait tomorrow, to see if Olivier wants to send some acks. > > Olivier has just added missing Acks. Do you need v4 from me > with patch 2 fixes? Your changes LGTM and I don't mind if you > fix it on apply. I applied Olivier acks. Patches are pushed if you want to double check, but I think we are good. Now looking at mbuf offload namespace series... :-) -- David Marchand