All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH][V2] mm: memcontrol: fix the margin computation in mem_cgroup_margin
@ 2016-05-24  5:37 ` roy.qing.li-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: roy.qing.li @ 2016-05-24  5:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cgroups, linux-mm; +Cc: hannes, mhocko, vdavydov

From: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@gmail.com>

The margin may be set to the difference value between memory limit and
memory count firstly. which maybe returned wrongly if memsw.count excess
memsw.limit, because try_charge forces charging __GFP_NOFAIL allocations,
which may result in memsw.limit excess. If we are below memory.limit
and there's nothing to reclaim to reduce memsw.usage, might end up
looping in try_charge forever.

Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 00981d2..12aaadd 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1090,6 +1090,8 @@ static unsigned long mem_cgroup_margin(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 		limit = READ_ONCE(memcg->memsw.limit);
 		if (count <= limit)
 			margin = min(margin, limit - count);
+		else
+			margin = 0;
 	}
 
 	return margin;
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH][V2] mm: memcontrol: fix the margin computation in mem_cgroup_margin
@ 2016-05-24  5:37 ` roy.qing.li-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: roy.qing.li-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w @ 2016-05-24  5:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg
  Cc: hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w, mhocko-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A,
	vdavydov-5HdwGun5lf+gSpxsJD1C4w

From: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

The margin may be set to the difference value between memory limit and
memory count firstly. which maybe returned wrongly if memsw.count excess
memsw.limit, because try_charge forces charging __GFP_NOFAIL allocations,
which may result in memsw.limit excess. If we are below memory.limit
and there's nothing to reclaim to reduce memsw.usage, might end up
looping in try_charge forever.

Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov-5HdwGun5lf+gSpxsJD1C4w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 00981d2..12aaadd 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1090,6 +1090,8 @@ static unsigned long mem_cgroup_margin(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 		limit = READ_ONCE(memcg->memsw.limit);
 		if (count <= limit)
 			margin = min(margin, limit - count);
+		else
+			margin = 0;
 	}
 
 	return margin;
-- 
2.1.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][V2] mm: memcontrol: fix the margin computation in mem_cgroup_margin
@ 2016-05-25 15:51   ` Michal Hocko
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michal Hocko @ 2016-05-25 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: roy.qing.li; +Cc: cgroups, linux-mm, hannes, vdavydov

On Tue 24-05-16 13:37:46, roy.qing.li@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@gmail.com>
> 
> The margin may be set to the difference value between memory limit and
> memory count firstly. which maybe returned wrongly if memsw.count excess
> memsw.limit, because try_charge forces charging __GFP_NOFAIL allocations,
> which may result in memsw.limit excess. If we are below memory.limit
> and there's nothing to reclaim to reduce memsw.usage, might end up
> looping in try_charge forever.

This is quite hard for me to grasp. What would you say about the
following:
"
mem_cgroup_margin might return memory.limit - memory_count when
the memsw.limit is in excess. This
doesn't happen usually because we do not allow excess on hard limits and
memory.limit <= memsw.limit but __GFP_NOFAIL charges can force the charge
and cause the excess when no memory is really swapable (swap is full or
no anonymous memory is left).
"

> 
> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 00981d2..12aaadd 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1090,6 +1090,8 @@ static unsigned long mem_cgroup_margin(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>  		limit = READ_ONCE(memcg->memsw.limit);
>  		if (count <= limit)
>  			margin = min(margin, limit - count);
> +		else
> +			margin = 0;
>  	}
>  
>  	return margin;
> -- 
> 2.1.4

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][V2] mm: memcontrol: fix the margin computation in mem_cgroup_margin
@ 2016-05-25 15:51   ` Michal Hocko
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michal Hocko @ 2016-05-25 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: roy.qing.li-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w
  Cc: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg,
	hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w, vdavydov-5HdwGun5lf+gSpxsJD1C4w

On Tue 24-05-16 13:37:46, roy.qing.li-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote:
> From: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> 
> The margin may be set to the difference value between memory limit and
> memory count firstly. which maybe returned wrongly if memsw.count excess
> memsw.limit, because try_charge forces charging __GFP_NOFAIL allocations,
> which may result in memsw.limit excess. If we are below memory.limit
> and there's nothing to reclaim to reduce memsw.usage, might end up
> looping in try_charge forever.

This is quite hard for me to grasp. What would you say about the
following:
"
mem_cgroup_margin might return memory.limit - memory_count when
the memsw.limit is in excess. This
doesn't happen usually because we do not allow excess on hard limits and
memory.limit <= memsw.limit but __GFP_NOFAIL charges can force the charge
and cause the excess when no memory is really swapable (swap is full or
no anonymous memory is left).
"

> 
> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov-5HdwGun5lf+gSpxsJD1C4w@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>

> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 00981d2..12aaadd 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1090,6 +1090,8 @@ static unsigned long mem_cgroup_margin(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>  		limit = READ_ONCE(memcg->memsw.limit);
>  		if (count <= limit)
>  			margin = min(margin, limit - count);
> +		else
> +			margin = 0;
>  	}
>  
>  	return margin;
> -- 
> 2.1.4

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][V2] mm: memcontrol: fix the margin computation in mem_cgroup_margin
  2016-05-25 15:51   ` Michal Hocko
  (?)
@ 2016-05-26  1:28   ` Li RongQing
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Li RongQing @ 2016-05-26  1:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michal Hocko; +Cc: cgroups, linux-mm, Johannes Weiner, Vladimir Davydov

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
> This is quite hard for me to grasp. What would you say about the
> following:
> "
> mem_cgroup_margin might return memory.limit - memory_count when
> the memsw.limit is in excess. This
> doesn't happen usually because we do not allow excess on hard limits and
> memory.limit <= memsw.limit but __GFP_NOFAIL charges can force the charge
> and cause the excess when no memory is really swapable (swap is full or
> no anonymous memory is left).


Sorry for my poor English, thanks for your description, hope it can be
into the log

-Roy

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-05-26  1:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-05-24  5:37 [PATCH][V2] mm: memcontrol: fix the margin computation in mem_cgroup_margin roy.qing.li
2016-05-24  5:37 ` roy.qing.li-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w
2016-05-25 15:51 ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-25 15:51   ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-26  1:28   ` Li RongQing

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.