Thanks, Richard. The issue noted that the distro specific update wasn't working but it's because they tried SRC_URI_append_poky (which correctly failed) so I didn't even think to try anything else. My mistake. I'll make the changes you suggested. Thanks again for your time! Scott On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 5:12 PM Richard Purdie < richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 17:50 -0400, Scott Weaver wrote: > > I didn't see that this patch was picked up (but maybe I'm looking in the > wrong place) and I received the email > > from Stephen that the issue should be moved to 3.4 M2. > > Did I send this to the wrong mailing list or is it not the solution > you're looking for? > > > > I elaborated in bugzilla on why I think just adding the readme file to > close this issue is enough but you may > > not have seen that comment or agree. :) > > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13612 > > > > Scott > > > > On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 9:46 PM Scott Weaver via lists.openembedded.org < > > weaverjs=gmail.com@lists.openembedded.org> wrote: > > > Added to satisfy the yocto-check-layer tool readme file test. > > > > > > [YOCTO #13612] > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Scott Weaver > > > --- > > > meta-skeleton/README.skeleton | 7 +++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 meta-skeleton/README.skeleton > > > > > > diff --git a/meta-skeleton/README.skeleton > b/meta-skeleton/README.skeleton > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000000..25468dc87a > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/meta-skeleton/README.skeleton > > > @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ > > > +meta-skeleton > > > +============= > > > + > > > +The meta-skeleton layer contains example recipes and configuration > files. > > > + > > > +This layer is not intended to demonstrate a Yocto Project Compatible > software layer. > > > +Disable the signature check when testing this layer using the > yocto-check-layer tool. > > Sorry, it takes time to page in the context for this. > > I think we should fix meta-skeleton to work with yocto-check-layer. I > think this > may be relatively simple, we can change the busybox bbappend that is > causing the > signature failure to be 'distro' specific, e.g. something like: > > -SRC_URI += " \ > +SRC_URI_append_mydistro = " \ > > and then an example is still there but it doesn't break the checks (and > isn't > enabled by default). We could add a comment about it being enabled by a > custom > distro called 'mydistro'. > > That change, along with your README addition should allow the layer tests > to pass. > > Cheers, > > Richard > > >