From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB25FC433E2 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 15:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA35208B3 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 15:43:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1599406981; bh=r/gOQLwi0vjxIzoJJal9o3e2qU4i0aOboXzVPzBsSr8=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=BfumVAx0e2pvC9zajC76Mo0x9iQ14g4bODuxbYzMO2jrhyiewYVm7dN/9sqxCjP36 fAElPf3kTgLQd58aAbiv9pvbnNeKZqxxKu7UPiARkkLJvbtbUIxAEd0szQjnDs8Kas eW3X7Dl0skX5tEDiZRJEEnwu+x+tuC75P1PyOpFU= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729083AbgIFPmx (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Sep 2020 11:42:53 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50274 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729077AbgIFPmA (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Sep 2020 11:42:00 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f54.google.com (mail-ed1-f54.google.com [209.85.208.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC587208B3; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 15:41:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1599406920; bh=r/gOQLwi0vjxIzoJJal9o3e2qU4i0aOboXzVPzBsSr8=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=LDXst8xQux98fgwS+DCPPihpnc/EIEY5qjXq28Z6Q+CGRBgcseA42lQoMei/yn6wl 7o3dnsXl8KCvWfXAyW6DQN8eWLud2lv08WmDva8Ob3vXhLaa5IAihtkKAgQoSAAx5o w9KubcmigtPzKB26MfUkK97aI+LYQYGo4cwv/I4U= Received: by mail-ed1-f54.google.com with SMTP id t16so5493912edw.7; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 08:41:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532nFJQzpVqxCCzLyHyNjM00mgT4uKzwyTV38z3lHJtLKn5tqrbt H0Xk0c8UukToWbW8LN5pcwBz9UUslDOmK+KRoic= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxIynhvt9FPtCkCknmoZlm54k/a28/XHX67a2orq3+WSH0hrY9/KZ8SKA/AvmUK58YzhTnGp1wjkPUSp+tg52g= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:ca7:: with SMTP id cn7mr17583253edb.143.1599406918482; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 08:41:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200804192654.12783-1-krzk@kernel.org> <20200804192654.12783-14-krzk@kernel.org> <159721917443.33733.7919188364233003142@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> <8066413c-367d-2f8d-3e7b-dacd954675be@samsung.com> <6ccf14a9-802f-25b8-494d-e957cafd073d@samsung.com> <20200812133109.GA15697@pi3> <30eb6355-0749-8268-c87a-f389dc4b4f1b@free.fr> In-Reply-To: <30eb6355-0749-8268-c87a-f389dc4b4f1b@free.fr> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 17:41:46 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/13] ARM: s3c24xx: camif: include header with prototypes and unify declaration To: Cedric Roux Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki , Arnd Bergmann , Stephen Boyd , Alexandre Torgue , Catalin Marinas , Chanwoo Choi , Guenter Roeck , Kukjin Kim , Kyungmin Park , Maxime Coquelin , Michael Turquette , Russell King , Simtec Linux Team , Tomasz Figa , Will Deacon , Wim Van Sebroeck , Linux ARM , linux-clk , "moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" , linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, LINUXWATCHDOG , patches@opensource.cirrus.com, Sergio Prado , Marek Szyprowski , Sylwester Nawrocki , Lihua Yao Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 22:51, Cedric Roux wrote: > > On 8/12/20 3:31 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Or even more important - is it worth to spend effort and time on this? > > If there is no single production system using recent Linux kernel, the > > answer should be negative... > > Well, I have a server running on mini2440 with a not-too-young > but not-too-old kernel. I don't have much time to test recent > kernels though so I guess that doesn't count. Actually good to hear. It counts a little bit :) Best regards, Krzysztof From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A2EDC433E2 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 15:43:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2188C2075A for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 15:43:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="J+bSUsAH"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="LDXst8xQ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2188C2075A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=jRbojg4UmYCTJr2HRi3AyxNBOhMvYnG43dp29BcxJdk=; b=J+bSUsAHj08L7orJWDKEXu7Fj 0Wmr7ecyv/vExfKZhXevjVRZUKqJVW+pfG2j9KOwfGjkvxTBNMVjUDFER1kdDtxAkoV2erQuDxOQr sAL+wEgKvW64DacdKQZQuAx5ln5djgYwkWkogML3+NMgOl+8h1fnZtfDHX9OLv9gHqOnAMF1xhgZH JpDGwpxm9qo+QYzs7MgLXTXs2Z+cr6T4UwmDNxe2sh27cnqoWJjIKS5t2LuIhzAl5TokE4dImNopB wE4yKkhFd1Agyaml4tqvqLKU0VWXHnLJ3xmRRrQZUV9vn3RwA05vRSMmYWRl4/Wsm1b6z2CsMMhHY fSas5rfUA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kEwo1-0008NE-Bd; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 15:42:13 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kEwnp-0008Hv-TG for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 15:42:10 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-f46.google.com (mail-ed1-f46.google.com [209.85.208.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06A6C21532 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 15:42:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1599406920; bh=r/gOQLwi0vjxIzoJJal9o3e2qU4i0aOboXzVPzBsSr8=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=LDXst8xQux98fgwS+DCPPihpnc/EIEY5qjXq28Z6Q+CGRBgcseA42lQoMei/yn6wl 7o3dnsXl8KCvWfXAyW6DQN8eWLud2lv08WmDva8Ob3vXhLaa5IAihtkKAgQoSAAx5o w9KubcmigtPzKB26MfUkK97aI+LYQYGo4cwv/I4U= Received: by mail-ed1-f46.google.com with SMTP id ay8so10286602edb.8 for ; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 08:41:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531BZINyr1TZVTrQYcKcmEGi492KqTWJEuItm1E1g8U5F0zMcbJ+ Am0X98xab2S/KjPvq96JdyEPkLzGZbnWFHtEtsw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxIynhvt9FPtCkCknmoZlm54k/a28/XHX67a2orq3+WSH0hrY9/KZ8SKA/AvmUK58YzhTnGp1wjkPUSp+tg52g= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:ca7:: with SMTP id cn7mr17583253edb.143.1599406918482; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 08:41:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200804192654.12783-1-krzk@kernel.org> <20200804192654.12783-14-krzk@kernel.org> <159721917443.33733.7919188364233003142@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> <8066413c-367d-2f8d-3e7b-dacd954675be@samsung.com> <6ccf14a9-802f-25b8-494d-e957cafd073d@samsung.com> <20200812133109.GA15697@pi3> <30eb6355-0749-8268-c87a-f389dc4b4f1b@free.fr> In-Reply-To: <30eb6355-0749-8268-c87a-f389dc4b4f1b@free.fr> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 17:41:46 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/13] ARM: s3c24xx: camif: include header with prototypes and unify declaration To: Cedric Roux X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200906_114202_067779_9C8A971C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.34 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Catalin Marinas , Michael Turquette , Tomasz Figa , Sylwester Nawrocki , Will Deacon , linux-clk , LINUXWATCHDOG , "moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" , Sylwester Nawrocki , Russell King , linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, Lihua Yao , Chanwoo Choi , Kukjin Kim , Marek Szyprowski , Guenter Roeck , Sergio Prado , Alexandre Torgue , Arnd Bergmann , Wim Van Sebroeck , Simtec Linux Team , Linux ARM , Stephen Boyd , patches@opensource.cirrus.com, Kyungmin Park , Maxime Coquelin Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 22:51, Cedric Roux wrote: > > On 8/12/20 3:31 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Or even more important - is it worth to spend effort and time on this? > > If there is no single production system using recent Linux kernel, the > > answer should be negative... > > Well, I have a server running on mini2440 with a not-too-young > but not-too-old kernel. I don't have much time to test recent > kernels though so I guess that doesn't count. Actually good to hear. It counts a little bit :) Best regards, Krzysztof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel