From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 735B2C31E4B for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 12:39:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B1421473 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 12:39:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1560515968; bh=h4+jr7GFm2wkitjdD2lHltRkw9ikoA87cqaxH5FXp1M=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=MK2JFINVvrE4AzZ5rdJvK7eUDlsjPT5ro62sEX8Zu729MzvvnWreLyj5sNebuJDrV 12nIcLfw8pEdGyvIrSzyRgtA9zRjrbDU0VqnW2ZqdTs4eraT/T1t4PydeyFKvJbeev CnVzXhBjr9zy2HnPNyCVunUVfdnTpk7BE791I1vc= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727984AbfFNMj0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 08:39:26 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:36168 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727685AbfFNMj0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 08:39:26 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f44.google.com (mail-lf1-f44.google.com [209.85.167.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB3572177E; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 12:39:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1560515965; bh=h4+jr7GFm2wkitjdD2lHltRkw9ikoA87cqaxH5FXp1M=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=hCx+2Pta3PtS85q5AlHrTvrSwcwe51L0/A90JL8ILfjHRek1cKA8fmZHGs8BKbVDI IuSxe8YbpEV+bLkVHT7S9jMd2bF3e60Zbvpxlmzr6HBT/AuMPTJKYHbKNkDWsT+Adm NFKlvZF4X0lGPvv7g/5zIqG3CPnUxzq9FvsEys+Q= Received: by mail-lf1-f44.google.com with SMTP id z15so1606465lfh.13; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 05:39:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX97+za6pRpmgAmHtMYCA2aR9MSkYXrakPoYke6SX/iwwM5jZLv nPD0ij/NauyB1Q7wP5HJ6orWvJ3Ul/7gmqe0NeU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzU4BYkdLXQ14moDZGW0N4jlP+pEkPQkjyQ1iy7sxRkDPxMnVuLMevSUvxQZ+wiK8Z5zxc1nfEIFrx9/KR3t28= X-Received: by 2002:a19:4f50:: with SMTP id a16mr47042701lfk.24.1560515963169; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 05:39:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190614095309.24100-1-l.luba@partner.samsung.com> <20190614095309.24100-2-l.luba@partner.samsung.com> In-Reply-To: From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 14:39:11 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 01/13] clk: samsung: add needed IDs for DMC clocks in Exynos5420 To: Sylwester Nawrocki Cc: Lukasz Luba , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, =?UTF-8?B?QmFydMWCb21pZWogxbtvxYJuaWVya2lld2ljeg==?= , kgene@kernel.org, Chanwoo Choi , kyungmin.park@samsung.com, Marek Szyprowski , myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, keescook@chromium.org, tony@atomide.com, jroedel@suse.de, treding@nvidia.com, digetx@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, willy.mh.wolff.ml@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 14:38, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > > On 6/14/19 14:04, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > I do not quite understand why this patch is still being resent instead > > of have been applied some time ago. Are there any issues here? Or are > > there any issues with the entire patchset (except some review comments > > to be resolved)? If not, then this is a dependency which should go > > regardless of other patches. There is no point to keep it pending... > > All other changes, e.g. DTS will have to wait for more cycles till > > this gets in. > > > > Therefore either please apply this or please comment what is stopping > > dependencies from being applied. > > Indeed the first 3 (clk) patches should not be part of the series any more, > I have applied them few days ago - https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/6/6/554 Ahhh, I missed that. Sorry for the noise then and thanks! Best regards, Krzysztof