From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brendan Gregg Subject: Re: Clarifying PVH mode requirements Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:49:56 -0800 Message-ID: References: <56AE7C3B.7010100@gmail.com> <56AF3336.7040906@citrix.com> <56AF679E.4040104@oracle.com> <56AF7E7A.1040305@gmail.com> <56AFAEA7.9060003@oracle.com> <56AFB1B8.5050202@gmail.com> <56AFB8F7.1040709@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5291291456977415665==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <56AFB8F7.1040709@oracle.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Boris Ostrovsky Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org, PGNet Dev List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============5291291456977415665== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1142ea468e61aa052abe0c7e --001a1142ea468e61aa052abe0c7e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > On 02/01/2016 02:27 PM, PGNet Dev wrote: > >> On 02/01/2016 11:14 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> >>> Is 'HVMLite' replacing 'PVH'? Or are they separate modes? >>>> >>> >>> Yes, HVMlite is replacing PVH. Probably once we get dom0 support. >>> >> >> If that's a 'done deal', and it sounds like it is, it'd be useful to have >> it integrated into: >> >> http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Understanding_the_Virtualization_Spectrum >> >> particularly as there's no mention of HVMlite on the wiki, at all. >> > Thanks, HVMlite is new to me. I created the Xen modes diagram on this page (based on the older modes diagram; if anyone wants the new omnigraffle source, email me), and I just created a Xen wiki account so I can update this page. I've been meaning to update this modes diagram anyway, and improve the columns. > HVMlite is very new: domU hypervisor support has been added less than two > months ago and Linux patches are being reviewed as we speak (FreeBSD, I > believe, is supported). > > >> It's unclear whether PVH, in its current dev state (at least here), is >> worth-the-visit -- especially if HVMlite is "ComingSoon(tm)". >> >> I suppose I'm looking for some guidance as to which to invest time in >> while on Xen 4.6.0, ack'ing that neither PVH nor HVMlite are >> production-ready. >> > > Current PVH implementation has never been described as production-ready. > What is happening now with HVMlite is essentially bringing PVH to > production-quality level. So should I s/PVH/HVMlite/g? Or too much of a simlification? thanks, Brendan -- Brendan Gregg, Senior Performance Architect, Netflix --001a1142ea468e61aa052abe0c7e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Boris Ostrovsky <= boris.ostro= vsky@oracle.com> wrote:
On 02/01/2016 02:27 PM, PGNet Dev wrote:
On 02/01/2016 11:14 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
Is 'HVMLite' replacing 'PVH'? Or are they separate modes?

Yes, HVMlite is replacing PVH. Probably once we get dom0 support.

If that's a 'done deal', and it sounds like it is, it'd be = useful to have it integrated into:

http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Understan= ding_the_Virtualization_Spectrum

particularly as there's no mention of HVMlite on the wiki, at all.
<= /blockquote>

Thanks, HVMlite is new = to me. I created the Xen modes diagram on this page (based on the older mod= es diagram; if anyone wants the new omnigraffle source, email me), and I ju= st created a Xen wiki account so I can update this page. I've been mean= ing to update this modes diagram anyway, and improve the columns.


HVMlite is very new: domU hypervisor support has been added less than two m= onths ago and Linux patches are being reviewed as we speak (FreeBSD, I beli= eve, is supported).


It's unclear whether PVH, in its current dev state (at least here), is = worth-the-visit -- especially if HVMlite is "ComingSoon(tm)".

I suppose I'm looking for some guidance as to which to invest time in w= hile on Xen 4.6.0, ack'ing that neither PVH nor HVMlite are production-= ready.

Current PVH implementation has never been described as production-ready. Wh= at is happening now with HVMlite is essentially bringing PVH to production-= quality level.

So should I s/PVH/HVMlite/g?= Or too much of a simlification? thanks,

Brendan

--
Brendan Gregg, Senior Performance Architect, Netflix
--001a1142ea468e61aa052abe0c7e-- --===============5291291456977415665== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel --===============5291291456977415665==--