All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
	Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	qemu-stable <qemu-stable@nongnu.org>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>,
	Dave Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-stable] [PATCH v2] virtio-bus: Plug devices after features are negotiated
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 08:41:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJSP0QUHdEYN+gW61eV-REGYRP84SpdOT8R7OPF5jCjUJpaMEQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94a0c474-4998-b03a-9353-d41d0e4e690f@redhat.com>

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Maxime Coquelin
<maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/14/2016 08:44 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>>
>>> > 14:44 < stefanha> Not sure if anyone can think of a nicer solution.
>>> > 14:45 < stefanha> But we're going to have to keep lying to the guest if
>>> > we want to preserve migration compatibility
>>> > 14:45 < stefanha> The key change in behavior with the patch you
>>> > identified is:
>>> > 14:46 < stefanha> if (!virtio_has_feature(vdev->host_features,
>>> > VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) {
>>> > 14:46 < stefanha> virtio_pci_disable_modern(proxy);
>>> > 14:46 < stefanha> Previously it didn't care about vdev->host_features.
>>> > It simply allowed VERSION_1 when proxy's disable_modern boolean was false.
>>> > 14:47 < mdroth> stefanha: ok, that explains why it seems to work with
>>> > disable-modern=true
>>> > 14:48 < stefanha> mdroth: Your Ubuntu kernel old but 14.04 LTS is
>>> > definitely still around so I don't think we can ship QEMU 2.8 like this.
>>> > 14:49 < stefanha> mdroth: Let's summarize it on the mailing list and
>>> > see what Michael Tsirkin and Maxime Coquelin think.
>>> > 14:49 < mdroth> stefanha: i suppose a potential workaround would be to
>>> > tell users to set disable-modern= to match their vhost capabilities, but
>>> > it's hard for them to apply that retroactively if they're looking to migrate
>>
>> Another thought: Maybe this bug only surfaced right now because older
>> qemus defaulted virtio-pci to legacy?
>>
>> (I think modern virtio-pci with old vhost resulted in a config that was
>> rejected at least by Linux guests. Because pci defaulted to legacy, we
>> only had the post-plugged workaround for ccw before.)
>
>
> Yes, for PCI with old vhost, modern enabled and recent kernel on guest,
> we get this failure at virtio-pci probe time:
>
> virtio_net virtio0: virtio: device uses modern interface but does not have
> VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1.

Is this error a regression in QEMU 2.8?

It's better to ship with an existing issue still open than with a new
regression.  We must not break existing users' setups.

A solution for the next QEMU version is to use a flag in the machine
type version telling virtio whether or not allow devices (e.g.
vhost-net) to influence the host feature bits.  Old machine types will
say no, new machine types will say yes.

In the meantime I would revert your patch for QEMU 2.8.

Maxime, Cornelia, Michael: Do you agree?

Stefan

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-14  8:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-13 13:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] virtio-bus: Plug devices after features are negotiated Maxime Coquelin
2016-12-13 21:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-stable] " Michael Roth
2016-12-14  7:44   ` Cornelia Huck
2016-12-14  8:28     ` Maxime Coquelin
2016-12-14  8:41       ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2016-12-14  8:59         ` Cornelia Huck
2016-12-14  9:44           ` Maxime Coquelin
2016-12-14  9:50             ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-12-14 10:02               ` Maxime Coquelin
2016-12-14 10:08             ` Cornelia Huck
2016-12-14 11:48               ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-12-14  8:20   ` Maxime Coquelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJSP0QUHdEYN+gW61eV-REGYRP84SpdOT8R7OPF5jCjUJpaMEQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=stefanha@gmail.com \
    --cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=marcel@redhat.com \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.