From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B41C433F5 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 13:53:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229636AbiJDNxw (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2022 09:53:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54138 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229899AbiJDNxs (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2022 09:53:48 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-xb36.google.com (mail-yb1-xb36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b36]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9222256B9B; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 06:53:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-xb36.google.com with SMTP id e20so2354571ybh.2; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 06:53:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=Hs3jvXYRoW9cue3NWCTKTBo720DcB8K81r/kuPpiKLg=; b=NKVA9fTuWcg09Dku5bT/SxrAfaWTl4KWWCzK5e1YEmWxMcBMAtGeke6u6Uzeys0MpG orqbTldkVSP4mEZ8pETdfFsIDjm3bdLtsGBnnVcs/0AXfagv8f4hTMz5TA+pYUNezVR9 x8B+dJxYJ2XAwOxtZDxCBt8/hC128iqbGxU0GCOPcd4Ga5TqAjZftpXyK2ofqDnwrWS9 nAYxOQDRUb7XuRKggMq9a7V4oh3Qjmytldrn5bEOpmMJGrPcTr8wx8zlH/xspYCjhwD4 2xOYNNERdQPKQ6fEQFdKFUl7h2mgA8nxiAO7+O8VgotTWu8yHzRHPuuhawFfZ6UEVlio pX0w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=Hs3jvXYRoW9cue3NWCTKTBo720DcB8K81r/kuPpiKLg=; b=rv9FfcjDuglG5gKKC6Ev1iOQO1YSiKdlERJqduMT0wBfm2Fa6sRth7cQRk9o/EOH4H mGbfrjVyWq+yNEN5hQTAd+B3n8RGfum5U+CuexvYk8aDECSDKr8/lCP4hrHifp6/JO3O QYe1/e7acEPuLONtHuY4K6/AEzn+SSJa038m4yMllquQL4zUCwfppwP3pJ/+Y8tx7ruR O8MuT6hCqc3eMhVdWtp0U276Zp42GXH6vt98Mo7K2ozJGQJekX37dzMenCThWZ+7gtdn RHcXcg+XlIJnZZrm5DPUAUEiWADuiKFzPCNoK8Jh37YV9eId+d+Ojxu+NSXKTzuD4bHl ejow== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf26XPZDAHeH/bLTf8dLS69dbMp/zgVW3EYjNkDuDxAsBvb7W48A i07NqqSnXXo8u/cLH+qnak3M6AEow+mn1dTHFn0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6+zGsuKsj2AwyUhlrPTvcMauXh5gjI+oX3NcpIaTUUvACKUgqczJK/iCDAJc9ZZht8ZphALvXUKQeyqyY04SE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:44:b0:6af:f412:cfb7 with SMTP id m4-20020a056902004400b006aff412cfb7mr23782496ybh.366.1664891624610; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 06:53:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Stefan Hajnoczi Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 09:53:32 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ublk-qcow2: ublk-qcow2 is available To: Ming Lei Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kirill Tkhai , Manuel Bentele , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Kevin Wolf , rjones@redhat.com, Xie Yongji , "Denis V. Lunev" , Stefano Garzarella Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 at 05:44, Ming Lei wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 03:53:41PM -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 05:24:11PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > > ublk-qcow2 is available now. > > > > Cool, thanks for sharing! > > > > > > > > So far it provides basic read/write function, and compression and snapshot > > > aren't supported yet. The target/backend implementation is completely > > > based on io_uring, and share the same io_uring with ublk IO command > > > handler, just like what ublk-loop does. > > > > > > Follows the main motivations of ublk-qcow2: > > > > > > - building one complicated target from scratch helps libublksrv APIs/functions > > > become mature/stable more quickly, since qcow2 is complicated and needs more > > > requirement from libublksrv compared with other simple ones(loop, null) > > > > > > - there are several attempts of implementing qcow2 driver in kernel, such as > > > ``qloop`` [2], ``dm-qcow2`` [3] and ``in kernel qcow2(ro)`` [4], so ublk-qcow2 > > > might useful be for covering requirement in this field > > > > > > - performance comparison with qemu-nbd, and it was my 1st thought to evaluate > > > performance of ublk/io_uring backend by writing one ublk-qcow2 since ublksrv > > > is started > > > > > > - help to abstract common building block or design pattern for writing new ublk > > > target/backend > > > > > > So far it basically passes xfstest(XFS) test by using ublk-qcow2 block > > > device as TEST_DEV, and kernel building workload is verified too. Also > > > soft update approach is applied in meta flushing, and meta data > > > integrity is guaranteed, 'make test T=qcow2/040' covers this kind of > > > test, and only cluster leak is reported during this test. > > > > > > The performance data looks much better compared with qemu-nbd, see > > > details in commit log[1], README[5] and STATUS[6]. And the test covers both > > > empty image and pre-allocated image, for example of pre-allocated qcow2 > > > image(8GB): > > > > > > - qemu-nbd (make test T=qcow2/002) > > > > Single queue? > > Yeah. > > > > > > randwrite(4k): jobs 1, iops 24605 > > > randread(4k): jobs 1, iops 30938 > > > randrw(4k): jobs 1, iops read 13981 write 14001 > > > rw(512k): jobs 1, iops read 724 write 728 > > > > Please try qemu-storage-daemon's VDUSE export type as well. The > > command-line should be similar to this: > > > > # modprobe virtio_vdpa # attaches vDPA devices to host kernel > > Not found virtio_vdpa module even though I enabled all the following > options: > > --- vDPA drivers > vDPA device simulator core > vDPA simulator for networking device > vDPA simulator for block device > VDUSE (vDPA Device in Userspace) support > Intel IFC VF vDPA driver > Virtio PCI bridge vDPA driver > vDPA driver for Alibaba ENI > > BTW, my test environment is VM and the shared data is done in VM too, and > can virtio_vdpa be used inside VM? I hope Xie Yongji can help explain how to benchmark VDUSE. virtio_vdpa is available inside guests too. Please check that VIRTIO_VDPA ("vDPA driver for virtio devices") is enabled in "Virtio drivers" menu. > > > # modprobe vduse > > # qemu-storage-daemon \ > > --blockdev file,filename=test.qcow2,cache.direct=of|off,aio=native,node-name=file \ > > --blockdev qcow2,file=file,node-name=qcow2 \ > > --object iothread,id=iothread0 \ > > --export vduse-blk,id=vduse0,name=vduse0,num-queues=$(nproc),node-name=qcow2,writable=on,iothread=iothread0 > > # vdpa dev add name vduse0 mgmtdev vduse > > > > A virtio-blk device should appear and xfstests can be run on it > > (typically /dev/vda unless you already have other virtio-blk devices). > > > > Afterwards you can destroy the device using: > > > > # vdpa dev del vduse0 > > > > > > > > - ublk-qcow2 (make test T=qcow2/022) > > > > There are a lot of other factors not directly related to NBD vs ublk. In > > order to get an apples-to-apples comparison with qemu-* a ublk export > > type is needed in qemu-storage-daemon. That way only the difference is > > the ublk interface and the rest of the code path is identical, making it > > possible to compare NBD, VDUSE, ublk, etc more precisely. > > Maybe not true. > > ublk-qcow2 uses io_uring to handle all backend IO(include meta IO) completely, > and so far single io_uring/pthread is for handling all qcow2 IOs and IO > command. qemu-nbd doesn't use io_uring to handle the backend IO, so we don't know whether the benchmark demonstrates that ublk is faster than NBD, that the ublk-qcow2 implementation is faster than qemu-nbd's qcow2, whether there are miscellaneous implementation differences between ublk-qcow2 and qemu-nbd (like using the same io_uring context for both ublk and backend IO), or something else. I'm suggesting measuring changes to just 1 variable at a time. Otherwise it's hard to reach a conclusion about the root cause of the performance difference. Let's learn why ublk-qcow2 performs well. Stefan