Alright, I get you.
Will send a v3 RFC.

Thanks,
Dorinda.

On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 3:11 AM Randy MacLeod <randy.macleod@windriver.com> wrote:
On 2021-03-08 4:12 p.m., Dorinda wrote:
> This test is to keep track of recipes that do not have a HOMEPAGE or DESCRIPTION,
> with exceptions to recipes whose SRC_URI are not linked to external sources.
>
> [YOCTO #13471]
>
> Signed-off-by: Dorinda Bassey <dorindabassey@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2:
> -Changed PN to BPN
> -Used set() instead of lists
> -Changed condition for checking recipes with missing DESCRIPTION
>
>   meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py
> index e1cfc3b621..633bf25dc7 100644
> --- a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py
> +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py
> @@ -40,6 +40,42 @@ but their recipes claim otherwise by setting UPSTREAM_VERSION_UNKNOWN. Please re
>   """ + "\n".join(regressed_successes)
>           self.assertTrue(len(regressed_failures) == 0 and len(regressed_successes) == 0, msg)
>   
> +    def test_missing_homepg(self):
> +        """
> +        Summary:     Test for oe-core recipes that don't have a HOMEPAGE or DESCRIPTION
> +        Expected:    All oe-core recipes should have a DESCRIPTION entry
> +        Expected:    All oe-core recipes should have a HOMEPAGE entry except for recipes that are not fetched from external sources.
> +        Product:     oe-core
> +        """
> +        with bb.tinfoil.Tinfoil() as tinfoil:
> +            tinfoil.prepare(config_only=False)
> +            no_description = set()
> +            no_homepage = set()

Since the other tests in this file such as:
     def test_maintainers(self):
uses lists rather than set()s:
             with_maintainer_list = []
             no_maintainer_list = []

             missing_recipes = []
             recipes = []

Maybe pick one data structure to be consistent.

If you decide that set() is better then make a separate commit to
change that. Apparently sets are faster for some operations:
    https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2831212/python-sets-vs-lists
it would be nice if you checked and documented what you find in the
commit log since these tests do take a few minutes on a lowly laptop.

The rest looks good to me. Drop the RFC if you send a v3.

Thanks!
../Randy


> +            for fn in tinfoil.all_recipe_files(variants=False):
> +                if not '/meta/recipes-' in fn:
> +                    # We are only interested in OE-Core
> +                    continue
> +                rd = tinfoil.parse_recipe_file(fn, appends=False)
> +                pn = rd.getVar('BPN')
> +                srcfile = rd.getVar('SRC_URI').split()
> +                #Since DESCRIPTION defaults to SUMMARY if not set, we are only interested in recipes without DESCRIPTION or SUMMARY
> +                if not (rd.getVar('SUMMARY') or rd.getVar('DESCRIPTION')):
> +                    no_description.add((pn, fn))
> +                if not rd.getVar('HOMEPAGE'):
> +                    if srcfile and srcfile[0].startswith('file') or not rd.getVar('SRC_URI'):
> +                        # We are only interested in recipes SRC_URI fetched from external sources
> +                        continue
> +                    no_homepage.add((pn, fn))
> +        if no_homepage:
> +            self.fail("""
> +The following recipes do not have a HOMEPAGE. Please add an entry for HOMEPAGE in the recipe.
> +""" + "\n".join(['%s (%s)' % i for i in no_homepage]))
> +
> +        if no_description:
> +            self.fail("""
> +The following recipes do not have a DESCRIPTION. Please add an entry for DESCRIPTION in the recipe.
> +""" + "\n".join(['%s (%s)' % i for i in no_description]))
> +
>       def test_maintainers(self):
>           """
>           Summary:     Test that oe-core recipes have a maintainer and entries in maintainers list have a recipe
>
>
>
>
>


--
# Randy MacLeod
# Wind River Linux