On 2021-03-08 4:12 p.m., Dorinda wrote:
> This test is to keep track of recipes that do not have a HOMEPAGE or DESCRIPTION,
> with exceptions to recipes whose SRC_URI are not linked to external sources.
>
> [YOCTO #13471]
>
> Signed-off-by: Dorinda Bassey <dorindabassey@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2:
> -Changed PN to BPN
> -Used set() instead of lists
> -Changed condition for checking recipes with missing DESCRIPTION
>
> meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py
> index e1cfc3b621..633bf25dc7 100644
> --- a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py
> +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py
> @@ -40,6 +40,42 @@ but their recipes claim otherwise by setting UPSTREAM_VERSION_UNKNOWN. Please re
> """ + "\n".join(regressed_successes)
> self.assertTrue(len(regressed_failures) == 0 and len(regressed_successes) == 0, msg)
>
> + def test_missing_homepg(self):
> + """
> + Summary: Test for oe-core recipes that don't have a HOMEPAGE or DESCRIPTION
> + Expected: All oe-core recipes should have a DESCRIPTION entry
> + Expected: All oe-core recipes should have a HOMEPAGE entry except for recipes that are not fetched from external sources.
> + Product: oe-core
> + """
> + with bb.tinfoil.Tinfoil() as tinfoil:
> + tinfoil.prepare(config_only=False)
> + no_description = set()
> + no_homepage = set()
Since the other tests in this file such as:
def test_maintainers(self):
uses lists rather than set()s:
with_maintainer_list = []
no_maintainer_list = []
missing_recipes = []
recipes = []
Maybe pick one data structure to be consistent.
If you decide that set() is better then make a separate commit to
change that. Apparently sets are faster for some operations:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2831212/python-sets-vs-lists
it would be nice if you checked and documented what you find in the
commit log since these tests do take a few minutes on a lowly laptop.
The rest looks good to me. Drop the RFC if you send a v3.
Thanks!
../Randy
> + for fn in tinfoil.all_recipe_files(variants=False):
> + if not '/meta/recipes-' in fn:
> + # We are only interested in OE-Core
> + continue
> + rd = tinfoil.parse_recipe_file(fn, appends=False)
> + pn = rd.getVar('BPN')
> + srcfile = rd.getVar('SRC_URI').split()
> + #Since DESCRIPTION defaults to SUMMARY if not set, we are only interested in recipes without DESCRIPTION or SUMMARY
> + if not (rd.getVar('SUMMARY') or rd.getVar('DESCRIPTION')):
> + no_description.add((pn, fn))
> + if not rd.getVar('HOMEPAGE'):
> + if srcfile and srcfile[0].startswith('file') or not rd.getVar('SRC_URI'):
> + # We are only interested in recipes SRC_URI fetched from external sources
> + continue
> + no_homepage.add((pn, fn))
> + if no_homepage:
> + self.fail("""
> +The following recipes do not have a HOMEPAGE. Please add an entry for HOMEPAGE in the recipe.
> +""" + "\n".join(['%s (%s)' % i for i in no_homepage]))
> +
> + if no_description:
> + self.fail("""
> +The following recipes do not have a DESCRIPTION. Please add an entry for DESCRIPTION in the recipe.
> +""" + "\n".join(['%s (%s)' % i for i in no_description]))
> +
> def test_maintainers(self):
> """
> Summary: Test that oe-core recipes have a maintainer and entries in maintainers list have a recipe
>
>
>
>
>
--
# Randy MacLeod
# Wind River Linux