From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f176.google.com (mail-io0-f176.google.com [209.85.223.176]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854906FFA4 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 00:08:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ioir85 with SMTP id r85so78112220ioi.1 for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 16:08:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=P1JzxlStDBTeCBXPHzqGvV9OjQ5APpMFgTkRaBQBgoE=; b=z0xAWr2iE9IAKbZAm//A56oqPNXbhAdmOMTuIU0hgXVlIxBllTWfnQZ5NtlXgWxmvH VHvR9wSfcFgWPvlFBWKE645viLRDSKmAutaPS6sr258u0NjzGh5KaefGwJLixj8qmRD1 cpIhlpM6PrUwpz86BpDnOIKgeViWy7WRhghIc3QDZeYbVLKgbNb5bleJL2wlBFlPmK+j w3aDNQ0JQpvdWYM6O/4LVQhWksjgrNMwJNmuOM4Udr4BSxYDfpuhuS/7Hkh11I0fWQ+S w4u3sJRAIpOZMEegMoqgUOnLn8wfKTTQcOOtiNEF7RkXKJUemOvc4dcdbMY4vVtkPcka cFwQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=P1JzxlStDBTeCBXPHzqGvV9OjQ5APpMFgTkRaBQBgoE=; b=FB5o6qx6uiYeZtoh1MAdOb/HiSksKvU5C5LtISo4lENYjEx8+UhThreAc+RpyBHtvr HP4FejQEQxGVVynTf78J3LQnSA94NYXAndOKrTh9e4JVeWNmku2LcyoPtfW+FNXDVG7m EHYtAsroVGgcHw8QyH80mhSdSvngE3a1/lEK2bgQgsWpmfiD92S4KqhDH5GIKEfbPQK5 5nsXldb3Nzh5EP8oqR2IMzH1ALO88a+AKjLhxQRnGN1Wh9bS9oCDjVEIp4+mWVp6lmJp jAgTNz4bzIVR52koucxmSPBCLZ08K7VO/xOF+AKY0wQptVEATclNYTVZvC4ad1suHCdP fszg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn9efcRKTS29bIZ4+eCRRvtb6cd37n/Lkp/GzaCIhzK3Wi88nW46KyA6HnF4Is70mHpQS+dqHsoJQhm4yxyPRKdsNTJcMbU8kRLvip/wR2hJsN+CNs= X-Received: by 10.107.3.144 with SMTP id e16mr7985258ioi.99.1449706082804; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 16:08:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.136.141 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 16:07:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1449185505.3199.49.camel@intel.com> References: <1449183819-236473-1-git-send-email-jianxun.zhang@linux.intel.com> <1449185505.3199.49.camel@intel.com> From: "Burton, Ross" Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 00:07:43 +0000 Message-ID: To: Saul Wold Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH] Explicitly map ARCH to 32 or 64 bit for Intel machines X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 00:08:03 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ecf40183ef90526800074 --001a113ecf40183ef90526800074 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 3 December 2015 at 23:31, Saul Wold wrote: > Just to be clear about this, it does not change the TUNE_ARCH, the ARCH > that is set is local to the kernel-arch.bbclass. > > This should also be a candidate for backport to Jethro > This also appears to be the cause of lttng-modules breaking in my staging branch: http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/22254/ Ross --001a113ecf40183ef90526800074 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On 3 December 2015 at 23:31, Saul Wold <saul.wold@intel.com> wrote:
Just to be clear about this, it does not change the TUNE_ARCH, the= ARCH
that is set is local to the kernel-arch.bbclass.

This should also be a candidate for backport to Jethro

This also appears to be the cause of lttng-modules breaking in my s= taging branch:


Ross
--001a113ecf40183ef90526800074--