From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id D51E4E00CDF; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 07:35:01 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.166.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid Received: from mail-it1-f169.google.com (mail-it1-f169.google.com [209.85.166.169]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C661AE00C8B for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 07:35:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-it1-f169.google.com with SMTP id c9so6310341itj.1 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 07:35:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aKwgetmLZlMIpu4+Hr6pRGdHJnuOlUM+cCYN2Mygi9w=; b=Cnx2kdiLOlJwjYZRp9DbDVgn6ywcvZgr5zzo+S+aaxW2YnTSy7tly6V9jJCZnMDMg2 o0LCtis3uRX2rwi4DXJoiu1Tt/BXiPZMD6k8jl8A29dbk+87JUprtWjil79UbS1ntZfQ 0dd06qt/PnQgR4KtvmszOF3qH+JA7JePCKRdouER+EKucwy8n5S+Cc/XyUtAen/0VPJX VrAU00eO77Br5+RtR9z84V5CSziBJt49yu7IR36g8TPe6Zwvj/3nqR4EfGR+qgD+zSQQ SiYluGMSfY7ImFYBoT/dVH3hX2sZd75arYmlgG9J7A15cqp1eLigtjwdGOqOXvNNob1/ Zq+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aKwgetmLZlMIpu4+Hr6pRGdHJnuOlUM+cCYN2Mygi9w=; b=brV//nd0vQYwzwCcm2j1M27fRIM7DRZS+SRR5gsmEozn5xJJ7AbjxY7vMlM9wkhXRh 6/kju+pVoZtr85RHZo9aOaXiMRp7JLKLmpEL6LU+wYhp0gtULRNZJfOfKjdybhHWP8il lKZkTHEl6GLudHxfeFZZFo+EwO878GiUOPsX+E7q+1MTdxOOIApIlf78Q66WpLAo57qa lR4F17S+SEj8qEwyZ3U1B3mmX8f9/fK/G3PpoL3OTGbEZraV7sm4wWw7/C6qq15y0Wc3 m0chq/uZhm9lIBIZau6nbF5y/wGmoSbeI674Sof89Mh9D00TxD6wtABtEI8cySxERf2k AFDw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukeK7Og8mNKqbnZseJ5GhCpXtn1+/fbF8Otr3vDSUC6tJxvenN8P yRiVYnNRQDbH5gFPeWc7eEmcEF5F8dzRlN6cVB+WeawE X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5Bu3Pgt4OU2x5VEYVRV/6Cj/wK1QJA/rxmhqwRfqqS68GPD6y4E3ROqHWvFtdOiq/ONlHv+cSlCb1Wp4TUquI= X-Received: by 2002:a02:9c53:: with SMTP id h19mr11265501jal.31.1547825700272; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 07:35:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1DB4D7BE-E62D-4F13-8F8A-A5103ED5F767@emagii.com> <7851f1d740f3a130e4ae5a1e9eb7f9e0273ee1f4.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <6a6bfb8cc510a344b4ef40389ba33fbfe525afbd.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <54452C1F-B1CB-4916-9CFA-C8FB2191C583@emagii.com> In-Reply-To: <54452C1F-B1CB-4916-9CFA-C8FB2191C583@emagii.com> From: "Burton, Ross" Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 15:34:49 +0000 Message-ID: To: Ulf Samuelsson Cc: Yocto-mailing-list Subject: Re: [PATCH] bb.build.addtask: add simple check for circular dependency X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 15:35:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 15:08, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: > We could insert a check if the KNOWN_TASKS is valid in a verification test. > When building core-image-minimal, the task order within core-image-minimal is analyzed, (dependencies on all other recipes is filtered away). > Then you find out if there are tasks added, missing, and/or in the wrong order. What about people who add new tasks? Do they now need to go and extend KNOWN_TASKS correctly too?