From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qg0-f48.google.com (mail-qg0-f48.google.com [209.85.192.48]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0006D75E80 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 20:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qgbb65 with SMTP id b65so76105089qgb.2 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 13:30:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=qjRWwxKx5FDYH/VaYHs1oFKx9gu/JXNmlbI3gKtX3wI=; b=Ky80rSp83FD3k1VtokP0VgHm+pnybNWR92UEGSglb78IFlSMAyFY2XVB/Tfq/RQCl5 d/c7Zs7ucaWOAW9fXSddPmmrBEyS3Pvtorc1t4pO+1riplAs6BLguHwcf/iI3YtzGzNg 0KgprEqK5Yq8VrhCwFqDZAx/IW8zt7hCDdkMmKDA87rqQqkXn4VO57EWTUYsZuvV3LNg aq7viCCgLZBnoauWx8DpbP/b7EFX7tm+q0Qeec06d6ZV5Ebq/5bNixzV4TSTKhLgVAOY Cfkeqb8+jHYsfUN3AsTnB6BSR0QLYjJtfXFKVOci1VgzVaPxsBTLjk20IHO8bWbyNedL 0VRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkHIUyDzD+xj94DyyhX3kVy32sXa+oT3uKHb3XJfdJvqBP7NAxfPZ6YenLoAKYbEPfm4dUs X-Received: by 10.140.16.21 with SMTP id 21mr14302917qga.87.1445632248045; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 13:30:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.94.82 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 13:30:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1445620987-11004-1-git-send-email-psidhu@gateworks.com> From: "Burton, Ross" Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 21:30:28 +0100 Message-ID: To: Pushpal Sidhu Cc: Alexander Kanavin , OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH] webkitgtk: Add upstream patch to fix build problem X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 20:30:49 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c051d49f11010522cb7c9c --001a11c051d49f11010522cb7c9c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 23 October 2015 at 21:21, Pushpal Sidhu wrote: > The patch is from a git format-patch, so the original commiter didn't > do a sign-off. However, because I backported this patch, I supposed I > can add my own name and extend the original patch's commit message to > include Upstream-Status and add info on the problem. Will that work > for you? > Yes, that's exactly what is expected - we need to know in the patch itself who is signing off on it being added to oe-core. http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines Ross --001a11c051d49f11010522cb7c9c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On 23 October 2015 at 21:21, Pushpal Sidhu <psidhu@gateworks.com>= ; wrote:
The patch is from a git format-patch, so the original commit= er didn't
do a sign-off. However, because I backported this patch, I supposed I
can add my own name and extend the original patch's commit message to include Upstream-Status and add info on the problem. Will that work
for you?

Yes, that's exactly what is expected - = we need to know in the patch itself who is signing off on it being added to= oe-core.


Ro= ss
--001a11c051d49f11010522cb7c9c--