From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 135B4E00B45; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 04:33:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.210.48 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-ot1-f48.google.com (mail-ot1-f48.google.com [209.85.210.48]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81272E00939 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 04:33:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-f48.google.com with SMTP id h26-v6so5379905otl.9 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 04:33:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dH6pj4HlmO3Ek1rjJcu9LujBxFgDkX/gRp1g86yoWE4=; b=gRYsI98ZP/ZUenwQtv0zVEv9p5X2NzQBFDrBW56ztc02Am46L+xVq4GQgzxCP8Wet2 MnNNNIJnozRcMRmWBcmdLV8EOLVoGB6TBpNIr8SFcIgIwdDqzlTb+W48w1/usm3oPxqM 0Ifgs25MHaDXqP0Sn0vtHC/LPtUhQdnWhv9oLaA5A4t3UWi5twxXec9p+rrKrzQ4LAUI B+GfSFjTDYZBcRf49r8KhU3Wll6hjMfMPAGbeozHC2lGxOWGiW2KCXTFlDWCTFP9MumX BwG6QtG6pvujb7mVUXoI4/5HnOOkOF1wjNOrel05XCbygxq5fhSxHN2xOdIgtPvadKEZ Az+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dH6pj4HlmO3Ek1rjJcu9LujBxFgDkX/gRp1g86yoWE4=; b=MVa/d76nsI/ltPUZ43UPR8dfQZBzCa8dAe7pSYEvzAVGR7BMe+gknY53UNpWE5OlYt NuT2hMXkouCC0TgSZhMSQdhWWvDUbz7zlcyISbRFJ2vkPwtOGMCFG3FsV1nVRdRBrTuU VNQsLFhYCKRxgn2uBa68sZCP975XmF3Df73VWFjkIoc5CpkJe6Empl1BGzZz5X323u1l zRaBPCO9Z/jWsX5DMFGgY5PZhrM1ZKmzkVZhyxrgcz0TchLORcdpaQP4D9Ikm/nqawLL cxfnLqg2NHNxlI1zVT9NGJRh0MEOv5OM7eq0yHZ6HvYREm9Y2UV58mI3/rOXNT46lCHG LGiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51C3569+g0e8764fmm1PZZGCGYbVQPoWo9Lmb1SVMpNKuacLyb9t b2u1Fvoos4QPC6Ll4Q8p6t+zlaeRPC4ZI0Ilh8Btjw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdaH/3yatKTMGGcpBBvP0SKMAYbjbCjzGPF4cR5DrSZSWnUUQi59yfF/ULNfPeyqWquF7IvAPtwBD15uh+b9LlI= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4ea:: with SMTP id 97-v6mr17340486otm.99.1537356828935; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 04:33:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6a084eda5fcb4423a647bb998471e26d@AUSX13MPC104.AMER.DELL.COM> <6bdfdff49ca04924979eba1da729d7e1@AUSX13MPC104.AMER.DELL.COM> <0c3dff3db46a4a83a73a4ffe1c83535d@AUSX13MPC104.AMER.DELL.COM> <340e2fcca899a6691605df89eb89f0e7e7802916.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <767f0527074648f48702fedcdb928152@AUSX13MPC104.AMER.DELL.COM> <20180918160944.43679aec@seebsdell> <20180918162048.35454f8d@seebsdell> In-Reply-To: <20180918162048.35454f8d@seebsdell> From: "Burton, Ross" Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 12:33:37 +0100 Message-ID: To: Seebs , Jack.Fewx@dell.com Cc: Yocto-mailing-list Subject: Re: [pseudo] Pseudo 1.8+ xattr sqlite corruption X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 11:33:50 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 at 22:21, Seebs wrote: > > Are the databases supposed to be shareable between different build > > machines? IIRC, the answer is no. Could you store the native inode > > type as a sqlite BLOB? Not necessarily a good idea.... Just an idea. > > I think coercing the values into range is probably safer. It should be > trivial enough... That is an excellent catch and I'm hopeful that this explains the failures in glibc-locales too that I still see occasionally. Is anyone actually writing a patch? Ross