From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-f174.google.com (mail-qc0-f174.google.com [209.85.216.174]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE653605B3 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 12:23:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcxr5 with SMTP id r5so7950304qcx.13 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 04:23:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=/sQPYJZXq+Jszb1+Ro4VPd/eNlNR5IFJERHQxoq/maw=; b=XRIQgmWGzXI7yfdEiQTFM/N0KmuDEuxNadfxhVOUz3PS3tcTyHRw3UJAAm3O53oaeA 2FmSu/ESD+37JtzK4lxXIRFil0frac5Xl/i5xsozOSZ1oRxbQtBQazvnR0q9a7Qw/5i3 TeNbmHqXiUMRiPttSqMQo5F7Dr1fYpgF00C7U6N/o5TAhVOhihcp6ZkAbAR5gtGkqXCo pw9fduIOkdjOZWYevrEmCCWw5NhBewgObPj1M/vOCUMIM+B51anogeN4PyUS3O66nPEq 72WRLCwpoyVsFSAUQzrJbL3LW1A3aDORNGxSyB9I4nmFIsCtJCmhJzBViEi3DZ5/X//Q ZqVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn0Vg2QuJ5ACj2pH5TklcMZ7SyjTQU6bjTu2bzakvGpyXwoxNj25CbJUFhSCKNiVeLmgxjv X-Received: by 10.229.3.8 with SMTP id 8mr18001655qcl.12.1424953391418; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 04:23:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.102.203 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 04:22:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1424888075.6730.19.camel@besquive-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <1424685241-17960-1-git-send-email-benjamin.esquivel@linux.intel.com> <54ECD3C2.8040005@linux.intel.com> <1424816244.6730.14.camel@besquive-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com> <1424888075.6730.19.camel@besquive-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com> From: "Burton, Ross" Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 12:22:51 +0000 Message-ID: To: benjamin.esquivel@linux.intel.com, Khem Raj Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH] glibc: 'yes' within the path sets wrong variables X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 12:23:16 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133997eb7c6bd050ffcd011 --001a1133997eb7c6bd050ffcd011 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 25 February 2015 at 18:14, Benjamin Esquivel < benjamin.esquivel@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Saul, is there a specific part of the glibc's run.do_configure that > should re-conf? > The glibc recipe explicitly avoids autoreconfig: "# override this function to avoid the autoconf/automake/aclocal/autoheader calls for now" Khem is the person to ask if this is something that can be removed but for now, patching the configure is all we can do (and sending the patch upstream so we don't need to patch configure in the future). Ross --001a1133997eb7c6bd050ffcd011 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On 25 February 2015 at 18:14, Benjamin Esquivel <benjamin.= esquivel@linux.intel.com> wrote:
Saul, is there a specific pa= rt of the glibc's run.do_configure that
should re-conf?

The glibc recipe explicitly= avoids autoreconfig:

"# override this function to avoid the autoconf/autom= ake/aclocal/autoheader calls for now"
=
Khem is the person to ask if this is s= omething that can be removed but for now, patching the configure is all we = can do (and sending the patch upstream so we don't need to patch config= ure in the future).

Ross
--001a1133997eb7c6bd050ffcd011--