From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qg0-f50.google.com (mail-qg0-f50.google.com [209.85.192.50]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA32E00B62 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:11:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id q108so6951612qgd.9 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:11:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=cRnaAVv08L4GLW7daRYm+epX/Pi0eevv/2jULjY/Jdk=; b=KUiord5qELBKpEjnd7P/w0Ns95YxhOQv+uN64lNIpK9ih74f8el4Wc151uafljzP4L 4+Apy/aRW/rgqpepg6kTylL65CMjWxSGqUNMMkYOoYvEo/OjT6Zkj2FvBlv/h6rlKMFs 0hEFZEOELWIjGzWkTUjTsmWKWVhEFURquc3oJAFFBq/NM7YaibluDMu9HMJjYNx4pZHr zBiCyWUfWtPt6Pioelk5iuGYHxULHfWKGZEo+B7KP2jFgYsyQ+LETBcx5pRLNeHgXgHG UsLTNl3c0d7UtAoREiK3WoBTZN0+GEC1pLNFUjbc8t4AhAAqe1dFxyWJqiYPVBxhfbov eCyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQliRnMzJRimspaAER+gdq4ZvGPJMw1Zp3p19FZOeeTNKwZfJiSebSsOav8sIsUPrqegrTiQ X-Received: by 10.224.45.197 with SMTP id g5mr57316528qaf.52.1395407478090; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:11:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.27.167 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:10:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: "Burton, Ross" Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:10:58 +0000 Message-ID: To: Paul Barker Cc: Yocto discussion list , openembedded-core Subject: Re: [OE-core] OpenEmbedded and musl-libc X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:11:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 21 March 2014 12:34, Paul Barker wrote: > I'm currently very busy between various projects so I don't have time > to hack together a musl-libc recipe myself but I should have time to > help test it. I saw that yesterday too and thought it could be interesting for Yocto. I'm curious as to why it's better than uclibc though (genuinely curious, I know little about uclibc beyond "it's smaller"). Ross From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-f178.google.com (mail-qc0-f178.google.com [209.85.216.178]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E446FA24 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:11:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id i8so2657983qcq.37 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:11:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=cRnaAVv08L4GLW7daRYm+epX/Pi0eevv/2jULjY/Jdk=; b=XVprqlz5j6cqZy/Gq96LL54l61CAkjUGnvL/VJwVEHGLq6yO7j01uglnYDj/Wn8p8l pTO9fc+Alx2Gbv0/IOECgo7MqhAGAlFET4gMZmfUlyWWnfxksS2gt/KGwbYZ/p81Yt6w Zicvt1mu5h31q22IJWHejk1WkSpjO5HpbeLd32phvyh3HCtDFCqP39FKUzEH2ViOPAuC VedAy9uk2fTvX0yXGXghdJThGKccPDcT/3zAjYAmvah7RSCJNRVMt7juSirwUWZnQwV9 n2ZQUrPgYnBshGwlIE40p9JURtLQ8yTCtiAPVbUYdiJXxFkImVyUpYVKBQG5aaHVXLOe Krfg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl07LEZHUlE2AcNoBl5b4GHaCUMSoa700+b1V8gst52uRPQZ7Zo+bmL50ktzkYCbmZoZpU9 X-Received: by 10.224.45.197 with SMTP id g5mr57316528qaf.52.1395407478090; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:11:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.27.167 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:10:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: "Burton, Ross" Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:10:58 +0000 Message-ID: To: Paul Barker Cc: Yocto discussion list , openembedded-core Subject: Re: OpenEmbedded and musl-libc X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:11:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 21 March 2014 12:34, Paul Barker wrote: > I'm currently very busy between various projects so I don't have time > to hack together a musl-libc recipe myself but I should have time to > help test it. I saw that yesterday too and thought it could be interesting for Yocto. I'm curious as to why it's better than uclibc though (genuinely curious, I know little about uclibc beyond "it's smaller"). Ross