From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f180.google.com (mail-qk0-f180.google.com [209.85.220.180]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BEC87653B for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qkcn129 with SMTP id n129so21510741qkc.1 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:03:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel_com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=7W+D2iNvwpP8ZX3yT6thLyuTS7sbnn0oDfecuZG0vQM=; b=ibJlE5Eji02EPtPtW30/h8TLZpT4FRU+at903nfvCWEQwY+69EX4jqrJexneyLzqWZ H6j/CcDo98xZJ4Cn17tY9OYr60q97YOrNspcxkaPfZpYpbk6KnWxdpBe/HnnZEVxYC7d znjit6j+GfAYVvn5P7i8OedDLs5I1kvrxPTeELfz3y3ToOK2xqSE8Wu+URVYT+sj+dG+ x3YR28CQDMpYLctBPkKHQF4S+3gR1JBaXP+hbM3mtwG4S1eZDQEdWBEWV1/c8MMx6WOP YHinVhcTrsl3DxaIbmdnQNwuw54tvVzPQlVPOQZpWg5iX4aMDhWv141mEQrrLv9qAZp0 3iuQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=7W+D2iNvwpP8ZX3yT6thLyuTS7sbnn0oDfecuZG0vQM=; b=l1LVITQ/SoV2Yd1fMjRQeUlPI9nDjPnRs6Aqp5pL3ny9EYWdqHCEdKUUoJ1CiggjWm 5O6W40A8lYSaTNspWNoU3zyWI07ezpR8Fy9HAPxJMrE58aRsUie1Z3xLzH4y/FW8d2YC 9EWyCi1SvWyeGq0BN3HSZXgJXWFAdet1wbSLCd1H1WgtJ34q5DjCDUtbzha9s70MoLQu qkD3HxANZJAGgcymea5CP57xlmc89ttvSflY6rLsSkwewqIXun2ZtB61AflzpAiwwCfr 3Q/0GWGwdQdStVa7eVS33l3le1NEaLI4IGPKAUrAJjWC3B0zJPuGVT067Ba0NJKn95/4 8VRg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlkRYDL1t9/kOeIqHQFYa9m0eTTDySpgDzsreaJMgQS9IHfDEQpE5AtzUzO8DYejj77lj2p X-Received: by 10.55.72.70 with SMTP id v67mr4495949qka.83.1446145380366; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:03:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.94.82 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:02:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <6A0E85DF-31B7-4955-B4A2-0F3E099FCF99@gmail.com> <16FB52C0-E87A-40C9-A677-F1220982FB30@gmail.com> <1556288.oU3CJGhmjq@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> From: "Burton, Ross" Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:02:41 +0000 Message-ID: To: Otavio Salvador Cc: Paul Eggleton , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Update libusb1 from 1.0.19 to 1.0.20 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:03:01 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114a97f6b0e76b052342f5b9 --001a114a97f6b0e76b052342f5b9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 29 October 2015 at 12:37, Otavio Salvador < otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br> wrote: > Due the memory leak fixes, I think we could consider the backport for > 2.0.1 after it proves stable in master for some time. > Standard practise would be to cherry-pick the leak fixes, unless you can convince the jethro stable maintainer (whoever that ends up being) that nothing will break with an upgrade. Ross --001a114a97f6b0e76b052342f5b9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On 29 October 2015 at 12:37, Otavio Salvador <otavio.salva= dor@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
Due the memory le= ak fixes, I think we could consider the backport for
2.0.1 after it proves stable in master for some time.

Standard practise would be to cherry-pick the leak fixes, unless you= can convince the jethro stable maintainer (whoever that ends up being) tha= t nothing will break with an upgrade.

<= /div>
Ross
--001a114a97f6b0e76b052342f5b9--