From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 03B0BE00AAF; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 09:53:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.223.177 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source * [209.85.223.177 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] Received: from mail-io0-f177.google.com (mail-io0-f177.google.com [209.85.223.177]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AB6FE00928 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 09:53:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io0-f177.google.com with SMTP id m81so7403254ioi.13 for ; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 09:53:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VrsfMRkXaHTt2f+oPpiXXvM+VQNlBdZcvZB9minkuN0=; b=ba4KMbpLiUiMQsDr0B3Sc5BbcQ25avyzzA6aGuYqZOjX287BWNqSk2RriBpmx/+wcY yPSlzDGG3IENCpv//9l8N3SlWPOg59XV3mXlsqF2PejZTBCVtw8ObbE/2Ce7V0gn1aHR gF0gy2DZnyrv/h7y/HB2do5gobK2zwpaiWK5+mJS5qEk5DdBDV/MzQvOzcfrhFpWGHvO ZxxjJ31GfyG4dj+pbopm0ImaiHAIuZ1hW36zPy6yDqmd8E5h4kAWFpJYZOdinOwZrStw hAdGWcnpg8saYE2pUQb/HnBs/NGT2s8k0uxIkktmTXdn2NK29NEYhJjDVwzMQ5FeTKsG GOzg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VrsfMRkXaHTt2f+oPpiXXvM+VQNlBdZcvZB9minkuN0=; b=MLRajwrbOvF8eOpCbE3dtTMIzSqPQOOjzveL5sWpkH8HRBi1UR7woVyRP1Pw8K3V3Z fU4wwnB2u3bovdvAj24MVxViG1+gnW0Rs5RkxcP8ZUHPFFVe4M8qvp0loNP40G4Tv8LJ 00Mf0gbnRd4m9OJEbCV4AS4wvtZUPWB3ZjlifCjoZdaLcNywNjjtnWqF1MVH8vhEL1V9 xHRhWSsAlrCxXIh12QBTdJXg7fzODuBp3hORNLq1FGwsjT9eclyVpIxoVp+8TCCW8ECw 15AeFNSKFHYws81fbnqdiTjZ3EPYF8tZGY3Q9i8MsjhouumS3CkU4ixp4GUdBmEBVUtt OZ0A== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaUx+JCVrbuXDz++Y2mwSsPmEBQwoRWzIyASvJurxOfCy9vse9sG 2nYnC8w89wfepX0l1KoOWRCiaarOvOJ4lSjqeBnQQw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Ri8RiZLBBiwYysJxlBo1y5hGXp1Z/MiXJqqq6IUzz6pEDI/nZkP+UixVjuT5iH74W7YBRtbvQKdprUQ1Tj7qA= X-Received: by 10.36.87.2 with SMTP id u2mr1299401ita.151.1509555191698; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 09:53:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.176.10 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 09:52:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1509546479.13007.35.camel@collabora.co.uk> From: "Burton, Ross" Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 16:52:51 +0000 Message-ID: To: Adam Lee Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Checking for xwayland X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 16:53:13 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1143e854f89c36055ceeb429" --001a1143e854f89c36055ceeb429 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On 1 November 2017 at 15:58, Adam Lee wrote: > Thanks Fabien, I definitely don't have Xwayland in my rootfs. My manifest > is missing xserver-xorg-xwayland as well. > > Which image are you using? I thought including of "x11 wayland" was > sufficient. Perhaps not..? > > Are you refering to DISTRO_FEATURES? That just controls what is *available*, not what goes into a particular image. As Fabien said, core-image-weston is the classic example of an image that has Weston. Ross --001a1143e854f89c36055ceeb429 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 1 November 2017 at 15:58, Adam Lee &l= t;adam.yh.lee@gm= ail.com> wrote:
Thanks Fabien, = I definitely don't have Xwayland in my rootfs. My manifest is missing x= server-xorg-xwayland as well.

Which image are you using?= I thought including of=C2=A0 "x11 wayland" was sufficient. Perha= ps not..?


Are yo= u refering to DISTRO_FEATURES?=C2=A0 That just controls what is *available*= , not what goes into a particular image.=C2=A0 As Fabien said, core-image-w= eston is the classic example of an image that has Weston.

Ross=C2=A0
--001a1143e854f89c36055ceeb429--