From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ot0-f194.google.com (mail-ot0-f194.google.com [74.125.82.194]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54B37843C for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 12:08:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot0-f194.google.com with SMTP id r30-v6so2364483otr.2 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 05:08:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MlpyvVlwdLfOP/jE77/Q1bGdVnkd5I9QQtTE/hE4DhY=; b=SKCL3W6BU/oP051m+eIo6diTRNvgLPfKqA/5F+LtGpyFRoNC58KkoHGXWJPzn/9Ofj eU79nmaHavxANiLgIP3yjdyjsHWOuSgAeAqSVPcSCJ+22xRYWi94dnqmNC74rZYUuLO2 K9X6IxDXgcFm3ZarUloeXX2Beq1DuosgClum2RiA1l23VswwUdtQHAhOHoRGwe+scOXu B5iRWKZ3cK80KHcHCea2CIrGv+CVFGFb+X5sn+sFvQCuo5C7hMmZjPwmtjqp9qF2ehn+ zbY+5shBVQNRR2Z4l+1s2qWTEggEW3M7pgmW3Og/THZ3ZQb8DDDd7Taoy2p2UfU0kQg1 e9bA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MlpyvVlwdLfOP/jE77/Q1bGdVnkd5I9QQtTE/hE4DhY=; b=SIYDKSdX33dfhI+a5utwQ0r+dg81YgDW5X7zA4E2zDCD8TSFdvtVpm+tJrl6ogg8cn 58x52AYgEGu5Oy2rAWZSPXGDM4ApIWbgz5wxRKbmJl0DIe1cVJ3inrX0sui4je1SCqsx hcEe3MV3cmHKfKiGn20SApx9oZ30Gwc2k4I0DcFT08qCK53BQaCzaXo4mDytIuspT9Xi mXy0753ZID/5EcBq2pRSn21UBkbRuCbYd3Fk9PrKBp9Xr5FTUhfUySKa7cFpPf6kY+Cx HBmvHASqYOIfxKDhgzT5FOhtuoBtDez9j/DEoat5dcHsw1W03VTQFIakcrI5uzs2j4+u 2RgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7EJAd2bvnDFhkbX9AgM585Av/P4KChUcmmtvhq9IkdsSUz6MjYT bGdOjbah7Xf0hMlrXR/7iQGN54keOa/JpuADu+TJ6A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+3+Sc6e7YhMmNjSEFb8Hvr5wnX+vgSTn60QOuWFNoL3Xo+cdbKelGN+2Xhlo5QncrPbdKt7ZBoDZwOEzU0WeU= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:154c:: with SMTP id z12-v6mr2133053otz.65.1522238882517; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 05:08:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.138.17.198 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 05:07:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: "Burton, Ross" Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 13:07:41 +0100 Message-ID: To: Bruce Ashfield Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 12:08:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On 28 March 2018 at 13:01, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:33 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: >> Also a non-musl target failed like this: >> >> | NOTE: FAIL [6.426s]: test_kernel_module (kernelmodule.KernelModuleTest) >> | NOTE: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> | NOTE: Traceback (most recent call last): >> | File "/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-worker/nightly-x86-64/build/meta/lib/oeqa/core/decorator/__init__.py", >> line 32, in wrapped_f >> | return func(*args, **kwargs) >> | File "/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-worker/nightly-x86-64/build/meta/lib/oeqa/core/decorator/__init__.py", >> line 32, in wrapped_f >> | return func(*args, **kwargs) >> | File "/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-worker/nightly-x86-64/build/meta/lib/oeqa/core/decorator/__init__.py", >> line 32, in wrapped_f >> | return func(*args, **kwargs) >> | File "/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-worker/nightly-x86-64/build/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/kernelmodule.py", >> line 40, in test_kernel_module >> | self.assertEqual(status, 0, msg='\n'.join([cmd, output])) >> | AssertionError: 2 != 0 : cd /tmp && make >> | make -C /usr/src/kernel M=/tmp modules >> | make[1]: Entering directory '/usr/src/kernel' >> | make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'tools/objtool/objtool', needed >> by '/tmp/hellomod.o'. Stop. >> | make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/kernel' >> | make[1]: *** [Makefile:1519: _module_/tmp] Error 2 >> | make: *** [Makefile:5: all] Error 2 >> >> Same error but with glibc instead of musl. > > That's the annoying new dependency kicking in, it keeps sneaking back > with -stable updates > and it is maddening. > > What kernel version is this 4.14 ? If so, I'll need to add the > dependency lines from the 4.15 > to 4.14 as well .. after just doing that for 4.12. Yes, 4.13.30 on x86-64 only, interestingly. Not sure if that's the test matrix being odd, or the kernel. Ross