All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@intel.com>,
	Jiri Eischmann <jeischma@redhat.com>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "ACPI / button: Change default behavior to lid_init_state=open"
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 01:01:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0g=-LfwX1Vx6U3=HhWqfYd6m5gfpmourWbZRuCzdS+WdA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170524080830.GE13096@mail.corp.redhat.com>

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Benjamin Tissoires
<benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On May 15 2017 or thereabouts, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >> >> Benjamin, my understanding is that this is the case, is it correct?
>> >> >
>> >> > That is correct. This patch I reverted introduces regression for professional
>> >> > laptops that expect the LID switch to be reported accurately.
>> >>
>> >> And from a user's perspective, what does not work any more?
>> >
>> > If you boot or resume your laptop with the lid closed on a docking
>> > station while using an external monitor connected to it, both internal
>> > and external displays will light on, while only the external should.
>> >
>> > There is a design choice in gdm to only provide the greater on the
>> > internal display when lit on, so users only see a gray area on the
>> > external monitor. Also, the cursor will not show up as it's by default
>> > on the internal display too.
>> >
>> > To "fix" that, users have to open the laptop once and close it once
>> > again to sync the state of the switch with the hardware state.
>>
>> OK
>>
>> Yeah, that sucks.
>>
>> So without the Lv's patch the behavior (on the systems in question) is
>> as expected, right?
>
> Would you agree to take both these reverts without Lv's ACK? We already
> tried to explain for 2 weeks that they are valuable, but it seems we
> can't make change his mind.

One of the reverts actually is already in (as a patch from Lv) and
I'll most probably push the other one for -rc4 next week.

Thanks,
Rafael

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-24 23:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-10 16:12 [PATCH 0/2] acpi/button: revert v4.10 behavior Benjamin Tissoires
2017-05-10 16:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "ACPI / button: Remove lid_init_state=method mode" Benjamin Tissoires
2017-05-11  0:58   ` Zheng, Lv
2017-05-11  1:19     ` Zheng, Lv
2017-05-11 10:12       ` Benjamin Tissoires
2017-05-12  5:08         ` Zheng, Lv
2017-05-12  9:50           ` Benjamin Tissoires
2017-05-15  4:54             ` Zheng, Lv
2017-05-15  4:54               ` Zheng, Lv
2017-05-15  7:42               ` Benjamin Tissoires
2017-05-16  5:05                 ` Zheng, Lv
2017-05-10 16:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] Revert "ACPI / button: Change default behavior to lid_init_state=open" Benjamin Tissoires
2017-05-11  0:59   ` Zheng, Lv
2017-05-11  9:45     ` Benjamin Tissoires
2017-05-12  2:36       ` Zheng, Lv
2017-05-12 21:50         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-05-15  7:45           ` Benjamin Tissoires
2017-05-15  9:17             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-05-15  9:37               ` Benjamin Tissoires
2017-05-15 11:01                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-05-15 13:05                   ` Benjamin Tissoires
2017-05-16  5:33                     ` Zheng, Lv
2017-05-16  5:47                       ` Zheng, Lv
2017-05-16  5:47                         ` Zheng, Lv
2017-05-16  7:15                         ` Benjamin Tissoires
2017-05-16  8:30                           ` Zheng, Lv
2017-05-16 10:10                             ` Benjamin Tissoires
2017-05-17  7:32                               ` Zheng, Lv
2017-05-17  7:32                                 ` Zheng, Lv
2017-05-17 11:54                                 ` Peter Hutterer
2017-05-17 14:16                                 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2017-05-24  8:08                   ` Benjamin Tissoires
2017-05-24 23:01                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2017-05-25  6:17                       ` Zheng, Lv
2017-05-26  7:39                     ` Peter Hutterer
2017-05-27 19:23                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-05-11  0:09 ` [PATCH 0/2] acpi/button: revert v4.10 behavior Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-05-11  9:33   ` Benjamin Tissoires

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJZ5v0g=-LfwX1Vx6U3=HhWqfYd6m5gfpmourWbZRuCzdS+WdA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeischma@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.