From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Guilhem Lettron <guilhem@barpilot.io>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel_idle: Add ICL support
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 19:00:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gJscMWLsjCm_L6jCDdZ2hdRB2mPtUBSgd1va7Xm7GyVA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGX5Wg3bVpgaFXHb1=4ikGk0P+4=XRqROBU4pqw1mpsY06dbHQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 6:46 PM Guilhem Lettron <guilhem@barpilot.io> wrote:
>
> I've done more tests, maybe it can give you more hints.
> I don't see that much differences between both (with and without
> patches) in this cases.
OK, thanks!
I'm assuming that the topmost two sets of data are for the "without
the patch" case whereas the other three correspond to the "with the
patch" case.
If so, the processor clearly enters PC10 in both cases and the
residency percentages are similar.
The numbers of times the POLL state was selected in the first test
look kind of unusual (relatively very large), but other than this the
patch doesn't seem to make much of a difference, so I'm not going to
apply it.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-26 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-26 12:04 [PATCH] intel_idle: Add ICL support Guilhem Lettron
2020-08-26 12:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-26 13:03 ` Guilhem Lettron
2020-08-26 13:09 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2020-08-26 13:19 ` Guilhem Lettron
2020-08-26 13:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-26 13:16 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2020-08-26 13:18 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2020-08-26 13:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-26 13:32 ` Guilhem Lettron
2020-08-26 13:41 ` Zhang Rui
2020-08-26 14:04 ` Guilhem Lettron
2020-08-26 16:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-26 16:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-26 16:39 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2020-08-26 16:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-26 16:46 ` Guilhem Lettron
2020-08-26 17:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2020-08-26 17:47 ` Zhang Rui
2020-08-26 16:52 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2020-08-26 16:19 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2020-08-26 16:25 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2020-08-26 16:28 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2020-08-26 16:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <CAGX5Wg0655U71nFcaAJXmj1XMA3MjnCVn=q1Pf=7LLyryHhroQ@mail.gmail.com>
2020-08-26 13:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-26 13:34 ` Guilhem Lettron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJZ5v0gJscMWLsjCm_L6jCDdZ2hdRB2mPtUBSgd1va7Xm7GyVA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=guilhem@barpilot.io \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.