From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ACPI 2.0: Enable TermList interpretion for table loading Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 01:23:09 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1AE640813FDE7649BE1B193DEA596E883BBA2A9A@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1AE640813FDE7649BE1B193DEA596E883BBA2A9A@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Zheng, Lv" Cc: "Wysocki, Rafael J" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Brown, Len" , Lv Zheng , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Zheng, Lv wrote: > Hi, Rafael > > Can we queue this up in linux-next? > ASLTS recursive tests are done in ACPICA upstream and no regressions can be seen. > We need more tests around this experimental change from the real users to have the chances to learn the unknown cases. > If they reported regressions, we could stop the regressions by reverting [PATCH 4/4]. > So it should be safe to do such experiments in the Linux upstream. > Thanks in advance. There is a rule that during a merge window linux-next should only contain material for that merge window. That is, currently linux-next should only contain material targeted at v4.7. For this reason, I can't put the series into linux-next right now, but I'll do that as soon as 4.7-rc1 is released.