From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F53C4727F for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:41:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7C920759 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:41:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1601480513; bh=zQv9vaKKC5bv01p/7fwt8eQnZ6OHQ9Uxe4wV/8stoWw=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=fkY+2uXlMQYlb7U8CgH+JMvMdLgSXeDM5T67LVrKAbfcoSNZIws09ZvFS9CNHxWEV bsd1qm3MwoCd9wEt0AC1t4YvzsBZSRX58YJG3cYdy/06gVpN3ve/XRDdCA804Yc1vm lp3/nE1IQea2r84RpOdIziUyjRxTcxDj9b49cGAI= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729175AbgI3Plw (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:41:52 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-f195.google.com ([209.85.167.195]:40641 "EHLO mail-oi1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725468AbgI3Plw (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:41:52 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-f195.google.com with SMTP id t76so2152547oif.7; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:41:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1boUtBUBLzQPw5c/Bp/DpOn4m94EkQSBe7ntlAkUbpc=; b=eBxUkvSK/LH2qsEUUrl7N6kzNcNMEGN3++4eP24oB6XU6tiYomcnhpHhhlJoJzVgTA 4D78wt1HSNALVtzNz03kGoNCJvFdbAr8oy2Cgcjx2UZe9wmqjWKM3n6o5n83jfBuIiw7 KvsaBCFdfnJnxZKJ9DM3sQu1dm4kh2IxBR0LoaXp/RW0HTZ5Es3PD5lwooSXniP2fNfg 4OBudKd3bjYGesCK5zYTaso5qinLZLDKVPvpZ3VQ/LttiLZXtm4fKD8u5z8GzAARc4oB gDrrd//ilI8+xM3ao0ovp5Vi31FEEEPKi1OTc8ZsNNRjfbWt6OmJgqxcfFO+Iw6iKRyB Jo3g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5339ti5LDvC2G6RJkxlW1LEsyiSbBsiZOuX3g8vbyan9NDKpYsAF YTc4tCaO5mUL4b+PfFnWKQHYMxFWQYOCWXQJkZU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwO8Zwm2P/HdWE4ZaRyDRWRm98cReLmsfm15FI09hCLMOcfxwQoewDPg0eRsuAM+RE0tTlRapJKHKbdOBdHW+M= X-Received: by 2002:aca:5b09:: with SMTP id p9mr1673233oib.68.1601480511860; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:41:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200929204157.26127-1-yoann.congal@smile.fr> In-Reply-To: <20200929204157.26127-1-yoann.congal@smile.fr> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:41:40 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: PM: Fix a reStructuredText syntax error To: Yoann Congal Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Daniel Lezcano , Jonathan Corbet , Linux PM , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 10:43 PM Yoann Congal wrote: > > Fix a reStructuredText syntax error in the cpuidle PM admin-guide > documentation: the ``...'' quotation marks are parsed as partial ''...'' > reStructuredText markup and break the output formatting. > > This change them to "...". > > Signed-off-by: Yoann Congal > --- > Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpuidle.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpuidle.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpuidle.rst > index e70b365dbc60..191cfa4a450b 100644 > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpuidle.rst > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpuidle.rst > @@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ which of the two parameters is added to the kernel command line. In the > instruction of the CPUs (which, as a rule, suspends the execution of the program > and causes the hardware to attempt to enter the shallowest available idle state) > for this purpose, and if ``idle=poll`` is used, idle CPUs will execute a > -more or less ``lightweight'' sequence of instructions in a tight loop. [Note > +more or less "lightweight" sequence of instructions in a tight loop. [Note > that using ``idle=poll`` is somewhat drastic in many cases, as preventing idle > CPUs from saving almost any energy at all may not be the only effect of it. > For example, on Intel hardware it effectively prevents CPUs from using > -- Applied as 5.9-rc8 material, thanks!