From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/21] ACPI: processor: Convert to hotplug state machine Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 23:08:28 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20160906170457.32393-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20160906170457.32393-12-bigeasy@linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:33835 "EHLO mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965001AbcIFVIa (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2016 17:08:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160906170457.32393-12-bigeasy@linutronix.de> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , rt@linutronix.de, Thomas Gleixner , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , ACPI Devel Maling List On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Install the callbacks via the state machine. > > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" > Cc: Len Brown > Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior This appears to be part of a series, but what if it goes in separately? Would that be a problem? Thanks, Rafael