All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-i2c <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)"
	<devel@acpica.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
	Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@intel.com>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] ACPI: scan: Add function to fetch dependent of acpi device
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 20:55:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hdSi4BcZvhkyrtcBQqRL8CHtOtwUeYW7EnWL2zvKhDZw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0hoDswjr+7r4uf6jZvV3t+-UDtEA0V7A_MvdT_34XrbJA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 8:33 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 4:11 PM Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > In some ACPI tables we encounter, devices use the _DEP method to assert
> > a dependence on other ACPI devices as opposed to the OpRegions that the
> > specification intends. We need to be able to find those devices "from"
> > the dependee, so add a callback and a wrapper to walk over the
> > acpi_dep_list and return the dependent ACPI device.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Changes since v3:
> >
> >         Both new functions were renamed.
> >
> >  drivers/acpi/scan.c     | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |  1 +
> >  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > index 195635c3462b..1a76fbdfa669 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > @@ -2105,6 +2105,21 @@ static void acpi_bus_attach(struct acpi_device *device, bool first_pass)
> >                 device->handler->hotplug.notify_online(device);
> >  }
> >
> > +static int acpi_return_dep_dev(struct acpi_dep_data *dep, void *data)
>
> What about calling this acpi_get_first_consumer_cb()?

Or acpi_dev_get_first_consumer_dev_cb() if you want to be super-precise?

>
> > +{
> > +       struct acpi_device *adev;
> > +       int ret;
> > +
> > +       ret = acpi_bus_get_device(dep->consumer, &adev);
> > +       if (ret)
> > +               /* If we don't find an adev then we want to continue parsing */
> > +               return 0;
> > +
> > +       *(struct acpi_device **)data = adev;
>
> And it can do the get_device() here, can't it?
>
> So maybe use acpi_bus_get_acpi_device() instead of
> acpi_bus_get_device()?  Would be simpler.
>
> > +
> > +       return 1;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int acpi_scan_clear_dep(struct acpi_dep_data *dep, void *data)
> >  {
> >         struct acpi_device *adev;
> > @@ -2168,6 +2183,29 @@ void acpi_dev_clear_dependencies(struct acpi_device *supplier)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_clear_dependencies);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * acpi_dev_get_dependent_dev - Return ACPI device dependent on @supplier
>
> And what about calling this acpi_get_first_consumer() ?

Or acpi_dev_get_first_consumer_dev() (in analogy with the above)?

> > + * @supplier: Pointer to the dependee device
> > + *
> > + * Returns the first &struct acpi_device which declares itself dependent on
> > + * @supplier via the _DEP buffer, parsed from the acpi_dep_list.
> > + *
> > + * The caller is responsible for putting the reference to adev when it is no
> > + * longer needed.
> > + */
> > +struct acpi_device *acpi_dev_get_dependent_dev(struct acpi_device *supplier)
> > +{
> > +       struct acpi_device *adev = NULL;
> > +
> > +       acpi_walk_dep_device_list(supplier->handle, acpi_return_dep_dev, &adev);
> > +
> > +       if (adev)
> > +               get_device(&adev->dev);
> > +
> > +       return adev;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_get_dependent_dev);
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * acpi_bus_scan - Add ACPI device node objects in a given namespace scope.
> >   * @handle: Root of the namespace scope to scan.
> > diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > index 0b2c4f170f4d..68d378207704 100644
> > --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > @@ -692,6 +692,7 @@ static inline bool acpi_device_can_poweroff(struct acpi_device *adev)
> >  bool acpi_dev_hid_uid_match(struct acpi_device *adev, const char *hid2, const char *uid2);
> >
> >  void acpi_dev_clear_dependencies(struct acpi_device *supplier);
> > +struct acpi_device *acpi_dev_get_dependent_dev(struct acpi_device *supplier);
> >  struct acpi_device *
> >  acpi_dev_get_next_match_dev(struct acpi_device *adev, const char *hid, const char *uid, s64 hrv);
> >  struct acpi_device *
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,  Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	 Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>,
	 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	 "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-i2c <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
	 "open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)"
	<devel@acpica.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	 Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	 Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
	 Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@intel.com>,
	 Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	 Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>,
	 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] ACPI: scan: Add function to fetch dependent of acpi device
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 20:55:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hdSi4BcZvhkyrtcBQqRL8CHtOtwUeYW7EnWL2zvKhDZw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0hoDswjr+7r4uf6jZvV3t+-UDtEA0V7A_MvdT_34XrbJA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 8:33 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 4:11 PM Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > In some ACPI tables we encounter, devices use the _DEP method to assert
> > a dependence on other ACPI devices as opposed to the OpRegions that the
> > specification intends. We need to be able to find those devices "from"
> > the dependee, so add a callback and a wrapper to walk over the
> > acpi_dep_list and return the dependent ACPI device.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Changes since v3:
> >
> >         Both new functions were renamed.
> >
> >  drivers/acpi/scan.c     | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |  1 +
> >  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > index 195635c3462b..1a76fbdfa669 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > @@ -2105,6 +2105,21 @@ static void acpi_bus_attach(struct acpi_device *device, bool first_pass)
> >                 device->handler->hotplug.notify_online(device);
> >  }
> >
> > +static int acpi_return_dep_dev(struct acpi_dep_data *dep, void *data)
>
> What about calling this acpi_get_first_consumer_cb()?

Or acpi_dev_get_first_consumer_dev_cb() if you want to be super-precise?

>
> > +{
> > +       struct acpi_device *adev;
> > +       int ret;
> > +
> > +       ret = acpi_bus_get_device(dep->consumer, &adev);
> > +       if (ret)
> > +               /* If we don't find an adev then we want to continue parsing */
> > +               return 0;
> > +
> > +       *(struct acpi_device **)data = adev;
>
> And it can do the get_device() here, can't it?
>
> So maybe use acpi_bus_get_acpi_device() instead of
> acpi_bus_get_device()?  Would be simpler.
>
> > +
> > +       return 1;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int acpi_scan_clear_dep(struct acpi_dep_data *dep, void *data)
> >  {
> >         struct acpi_device *adev;
> > @@ -2168,6 +2183,29 @@ void acpi_dev_clear_dependencies(struct acpi_device *supplier)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_clear_dependencies);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * acpi_dev_get_dependent_dev - Return ACPI device dependent on @supplier
>
> And what about calling this acpi_get_first_consumer() ?

Or acpi_dev_get_first_consumer_dev() (in analogy with the above)?

> > + * @supplier: Pointer to the dependee device
> > + *
> > + * Returns the first &struct acpi_device which declares itself dependent on
> > + * @supplier via the _DEP buffer, parsed from the acpi_dep_list.
> > + *
> > + * The caller is responsible for putting the reference to adev when it is no
> > + * longer needed.
> > + */
> > +struct acpi_device *acpi_dev_get_dependent_dev(struct acpi_device *supplier)
> > +{
> > +       struct acpi_device *adev = NULL;
> > +
> > +       acpi_walk_dep_device_list(supplier->handle, acpi_return_dep_dev, &adev);
> > +
> > +       if (adev)
> > +               get_device(&adev->dev);
> > +
> > +       return adev;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_get_dependent_dev);
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * acpi_bus_scan - Add ACPI device node objects in a given namespace scope.
> >   * @handle: Root of the namespace scope to scan.
> > diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > index 0b2c4f170f4d..68d378207704 100644
> > --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > @@ -692,6 +692,7 @@ static inline bool acpi_device_can_poweroff(struct acpi_device *adev)
> >  bool acpi_dev_hid_uid_match(struct acpi_device *adev, const char *hid2, const char *uid2);
> >
> >  void acpi_dev_clear_dependencies(struct acpi_device *supplier);
> > +struct acpi_device *acpi_dev_get_dependent_dev(struct acpi_device *supplier);
> >  struct acpi_device *
> >  acpi_dev_get_next_match_dev(struct acpi_device *adev, const char *hid, const char *uid, s64 hrv);
> >  struct acpi_device *
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael at kernel.org>
To: devel@acpica.org
Subject: [Devel] Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] ACPI: scan: Add function to fetch dependent of acpi device
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 20:55:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hdSi4BcZvhkyrtcBQqRL8CHtOtwUeYW7EnWL2zvKhDZw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CAJZ5v0hoDswjr+7r4uf6jZvV3t+-UDtEA0V7A_MvdT_34XrbJA@mail.gmail.com

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4108 bytes --]

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 8:33 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael(a)kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 4:11 PM Daniel Scally <djrscally(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > In some ACPI tables we encounter, devices use the _DEP method to assert
> > a dependence on other ACPI devices as opposed to the OpRegions that the
> > specification intends. We need to be able to find those devices "from"
> > the dependee, so add a callback and a wrapper to walk over the
> > acpi_dep_list and return the dependent ACPI device.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko(a)gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally(a)gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Changes since v3:
> >
> >         Both new functions were renamed.
> >
> >  drivers/acpi/scan.c     | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |  1 +
> >  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > index 195635c3462b..1a76fbdfa669 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > @@ -2105,6 +2105,21 @@ static void acpi_bus_attach(struct acpi_device *device, bool first_pass)
> >                 device->handler->hotplug.notify_online(device);
> >  }
> >
> > +static int acpi_return_dep_dev(struct acpi_dep_data *dep, void *data)
>
> What about calling this acpi_get_first_consumer_cb()?

Or acpi_dev_get_first_consumer_dev_cb() if you want to be super-precise?

>
> > +{
> > +       struct acpi_device *adev;
> > +       int ret;
> > +
> > +       ret = acpi_bus_get_device(dep->consumer, &adev);
> > +       if (ret)
> > +               /* If we don't find an adev then we want to continue parsing */
> > +               return 0;
> > +
> > +       *(struct acpi_device **)data = adev;
>
> And it can do the get_device() here, can't it?
>
> So maybe use acpi_bus_get_acpi_device() instead of
> acpi_bus_get_device()?  Would be simpler.
>
> > +
> > +       return 1;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int acpi_scan_clear_dep(struct acpi_dep_data *dep, void *data)
> >  {
> >         struct acpi_device *adev;
> > @@ -2168,6 +2183,29 @@ void acpi_dev_clear_dependencies(struct acpi_device *supplier)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_clear_dependencies);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * acpi_dev_get_dependent_dev - Return ACPI device dependent on @supplier
>
> And what about calling this acpi_get_first_consumer() ?

Or acpi_dev_get_first_consumer_dev() (in analogy with the above)?

> > + * @supplier: Pointer to the dependee device
> > + *
> > + * Returns the first &struct acpi_device which declares itself dependent on
> > + * @supplier via the _DEP buffer, parsed from the acpi_dep_list.
> > + *
> > + * The caller is responsible for putting the reference to adev when it is no
> > + * longer needed.
> > + */
> > +struct acpi_device *acpi_dev_get_dependent_dev(struct acpi_device *supplier)
> > +{
> > +       struct acpi_device *adev = NULL;
> > +
> > +       acpi_walk_dep_device_list(supplier->handle, acpi_return_dep_dev, &adev);
> > +
> > +       if (adev)
> > +               get_device(&adev->dev);
> > +
> > +       return adev;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_get_dependent_dev);
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * acpi_bus_scan - Add ACPI device node objects in a given namespace scope.
> >   * @handle: Root of the namespace scope to scan.
> > diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > index 0b2c4f170f4d..68d378207704 100644
> > --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > @@ -692,6 +692,7 @@ static inline bool acpi_device_can_poweroff(struct acpi_device *adev)
> >  bool acpi_dev_hid_uid_match(struct acpi_device *adev, const char *hid2, const char *uid2);
> >
> >  void acpi_dev_clear_dependencies(struct acpi_device *supplier);
> > +struct acpi_device *acpi_dev_get_dependent_dev(struct acpi_device *supplier);
> >  struct acpi_device *
> >  acpi_dev_get_next_match_dev(struct acpi_device *adev, const char *hid, const char *uid, s64 hrv);
> >  struct acpi_device *
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-20 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-20 14:09 [PATCH v4 0/8] Introduce intel_skl_int3472 module Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09 ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] ACPI: scan: Extend acpi_walk_dep_device_list() Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09   ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 17:15   ` Maximilian Luz
2021-05-20 17:15     ` Maximilian Luz
2021-05-20 18:22   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-05-20 18:22     ` [Devel] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-05-20 18:22     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-05-20 21:03     ` Hans de Goede
2021-05-20 21:03       ` Hans de Goede
2021-05-21 12:59   ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-21 12:59     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-20 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] ACPI: scan: Add function to fetch dependent of acpi device Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09   ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 18:33   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-05-20 18:33     ` [Devel] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-05-20 18:33     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-05-20 18:55     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2021-05-20 18:55       ` [Devel] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-05-20 18:55       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-05-21 19:25       ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-21 19:25         ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] i2c: core: Add a format macro for I2C device names Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09   ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] gpiolib: acpi: Export acpi_get_gpiod() Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09   ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] clkdev: Make clkdev_drop() null aware Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09   ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] gpiolib: acpi: Add acpi_gpio_get_io_resource() Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09   ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-21 12:05   ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-21 12:05     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-25 22:30     ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-25 22:30       ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] platform/x86: Add intel_skl_int3472 driver Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09   ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-21 12:57   ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-21 12:57     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-25 22:53     ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-25 22:53       ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-26  7:54       ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-26  7:54         ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-20 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] mfd: tps68470: Remove tps68470 MFD driver Daniel Scally
2021-05-20 14:09   ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-25 13:10 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] Introduce intel_skl_int3472 module Hans de Goede
2021-05-25 13:10   ` Hans de Goede
2021-05-25 13:12   ` Hans de Goede
2021-05-25 13:12     ` Hans de Goede
2021-05-25 13:23     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-25 13:23       ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-25 23:03   ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-25 23:03     ` Daniel Scally
2021-05-26  7:55     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-26  7:55       ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-26 12:36     ` Hans de Goede
2021-05-26 12:36       ` Hans de Goede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJZ5v0hdSi4BcZvhkyrtcBQqRL8CHtOtwUeYW7EnWL2zvKhDZw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=devel@acpica.org \
    --cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
    --cc=erik.kaneda@intel.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=luzmaximilian@gmail.com \
    --cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=wsa@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.