From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] ACPI: new acpi_dev_present helper + ac and battery blacklist patches Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 12:38:43 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20170419120212.24949-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20170419203340.GI2619@lahna.fi.intel.com> <1492676409.24567.92.camel@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1492676409.24567.92.camel@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Shevchenko , Hans de Goede Cc: Mika Westerberg , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown , Sebastian Reichel , Lukas Wunner , Robert Moore , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux PM List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, 2017-04-19 at 23:33 +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 09:37:50PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Hans de Goede >> > wrote: >> > > Hi Rafael, >> > > >> > > This is a new version of my acpi_dev_present helper + ac and >> > > battery >> > > blacklist patches, new compared to the v5 resend of the latest >> > > version of all these patches are some changes to the first, >> > > third and fourth patch as requested by Andy Shevchenko. >> > > >> > > This set also includes a power-supply patch, which depends on the >> > > new acpi_dev_present helper and has an Ack from Sebastian Reichel >> > > (the power-supply maintainer) for being merged through the ACPI >> > > tree because of that dependency. >> > > >> > > These patches obsolete: >> > > -earlier versions of patches with the same title >> > > -"ACPI: battery: Add acpi_battery_unregister() function" >> > > -"ACPI: ac: Add acpi_ac_unregister() function" >> > > -"power: supply: axp288_fuel_gauge: Unregister duplicate ACPI >> > > battery supply" >> > > -"power: supply: axp288_charger: Unregister duplicate ACPI ac >> > > supply" >> > >> > Andy, Mika, any concerns about anything this series? >> >> No concerns from my side. > > Neither from mine. OK, so series applied, thanks!