From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625B6C433FE for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 16:14:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B3C460F58 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 16:14:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345829AbhIMQQG (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 12:16:06 -0400 Received: from mail-oo1-f45.google.com ([209.85.161.45]:36432 "EHLO mail-oo1-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232274AbhIMQQF (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 12:16:05 -0400 Received: by mail-oo1-f45.google.com with SMTP id y47-20020a4a9832000000b00290fb9f6d3fso3591840ooi.3; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 09:14:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jD6b4gjEXuMSDssAEUxv3yw1AVPOlnQQhosOE6fABxw=; b=mKE4Vwwhq4fOc6+vUkZco0lYCkl/hGnrrBt0agM2z8MZHfzep/rPS0DFpfWRoDRLFx jCFqVbDa4BnxLDhBQRjj7i62+7pebm/oQ1TosFNa9qRnIDDed4IihAcTyZvwZ/X/eEH1 xO2yRs/vGB9pnq6aDtGiEoEORH/vzLY0UZYExzF3goVLrZjpMf0fQu6ctpbnV5Yx8h+S azIwAJj3UQWFMu1m4aYJBO8yxfNXkoB9/Z2iGe+OPJXR7g6PNqGVs1qW2UVgyhX+Tdk7 h6RxDSlCago9eI5mLD/s7TGRF+EpwYpmkK2NQrSLQrp89XAH7FHewy4MI5OGjuYBEgSC XUaQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ewk9O9IFYVMLcl973XKbQEMHQqE0dAVmLJuqKuxfYTAJ80gGW tr5Md/DTGC0ANy2e5RZyWHPXCt7CUAo3I8+CAfI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz1C8i4WX56ljYUCpTaGKUQWQ7b2nSz3hNmFxzBCW7JaZjHuAA84c2M8Mm425XO9BsEXk6qvmLfTbSA5ZHcHyk= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:a78a:: with SMTP id l10mr9814539oom.30.1631549689413; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 09:14:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210824122054.29481-1-joro@8bytes.org> In-Reply-To: From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 18:14:38 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI/ACPI: Simplify PCIe _OSC feature negotiation To: Joerg Roedel Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown , Linux PCI , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Joerg Roedel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 9:33 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 2:21 PM Joerg Roedel wrote: > > > > From: Joerg Roedel > > > > Hi, > > > > here is the third version of my patches to simplify the _OSC > > negotiation of PCIe features between Linux and the firmware. > > > > This version is a complete rewrite, so there is no changelog to the > > previous version. Patches 1-3 are cleanups and small restructurings of > > the code as a preparation for patch 4. > > > > The last patch gets rid of the dedicated _OSC query to check for _OSC > > support and merges that functionality into acpi_pci_osc_control_set(). > > > > This allows to simplify and/or remove other functions and consilidate > > error handling in negotiate_os_control(). > > > > I have tested the patches with and without 'pcie_ports=compat' and > > found no regressions on my test machine. > > I have reviewed the patches, so if you want me to queue up this > series, please let me know. Should I assume that Bjorn will be taking it?