From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ACPI / sysfs: Cleanup sysfs table handling code Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 03:49:23 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1AE640813FDE7649BE1B193DEA596E883BC0EAC6@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:35424 "EHLO mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752152AbcHQBtZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 21:49:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1AE640813FDE7649BE1B193DEA596E883BC0EAC6@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Zheng, Lv" Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Wysocki, Rafael J" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Brown, Len" , Lv Zheng , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ACPI Devel Maling List On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 3:46 AM, Zheng, Lv wrote: > Hi, > >> From: rjwysocki@gmail.com [mailto:rjwysocki@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rafael J. Wysocki >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ACPI / sysfs: Cleanup sysfs table handling code >> >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Lv Zheng wrote: >> > There are issues in sysfs table handling code: >> > 1. It cannot handle table loaded by LoadTable opcode executed after >> > acpi_sysfs_init(); >> > 2. It's signature handling code is not correct. >> > >> > This patchset fixes these issues. >> > >> > Lv Zheng (5): >> > ACPICA: Tables: Remove acpi_tb_install_fixed_table() >> > ACPICA: Tables: Remove wrong table event macros >> > ACPICA: Tables: Add new table events indicating table >> > installation/uninstallation >> > ACPI / sysfs: Fix an issue for LoadTable opcode >> > ACPI / sysfs: Update sysfs signature handling code >> > >> > drivers/acpi/acpica/actables.h | 7 +--- >> > drivers/acpi/acpica/tbfadt.c | 24 +++++++------ >> > drivers/acpi/acpica/tbinstal.c | 73 +++++----------------------------------- >> > drivers/acpi/sysfs.c | 39 ++++++++++----------- >> > include/acpi/actypes.h | 16 ++++----- >> > 5 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-) >> >> Patches [1-3/5] clearly modify ACPICA. Have they gone into the >> upstream already? > > No, they are fixing an urgent user reported bug. > So I posted them for the reporters. > We can wait until PATCH 1-3 merged in the ACPICA upstream. OK Thanks, Rafael