From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] PM / mfd: intel-lpss: Use DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 17:28:57 +0100 Message-ID: References: <3806130.B2KCK0tvef@aspire.rjw.lan> <5094729.JAaD38WncM@aspire.rjw.lan> <20171031150933.oho2ffvuj3iagx4m@dell> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171031150933.oho2ffvuj3iagx4m@dell> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lee Jones Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM , Bjorn Helgaas , Alan Stern , Greg Kroah-Hartman , LKML , Linux ACPI , Linux PCI , Linux Documentation , Mika Westerberg , Ulf Hansson , Andy Shevchenko , Kevin Hilman , Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki >> >> Make the intel-lpss driver set DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND for its >> devices which will allow them to stay in runtime suspend during >> system suspend unless they need to be reconfigured for some reason. >> >> Also make it avoid resuming its child devices if they have >> DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND set to allow them to remain in runtime >> suspend during system suspend. >> >> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki >> --- >> drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c | 6 +++++- >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Is this patch independent? It depends on the flag definition at least, but functionally it also depends on the PCI support for the flag. > For my own reference: > Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones Thanks, Rafael