From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/20] sched/idle: Use explicit broadcast oneshot control function Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 14:19:11 +0200 Message-ID: References: <2112147.0kYCHhbEJT@vostro.rjw.lan> <18575128.8R6Lp68k0Q@vostro.rjw.lan> <553F6236.5020300@linaro.org> <553F6424.1090704@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <553F6424.1090704@arm.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sudeep Holla Cc: Daniel Lezcano , Linus Walleij , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM list , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ACPI Devel Maling List List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > On 28/04/15 11:34, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> >> On 04/28/2015 12:11 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki >>> wrote: >>> >>>> From: Thomas Gleixner >>>> >>>> Replace the clockevents_notify() call with an explicit function >>>> call. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner >>>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki >>> >>> >>> For some reason this makes my Ux500 system arbitrarily hang, >>> especially during boot. Bisected down to this commit. Since the >>> entire changeset is removing the notifications altogether I can't >>> just revert it. >>> >>> Disabling CONFIG_CPU_IDLE removes the problem. >>> >>> Tried registering a stub driver (I just #if 0 all the code in >>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-ux500.c) it still crashes. >>> >>> That makes me think something inside the cpuidle subsystem is >>> locking up after this, but my other idea is that the timer may be >>> involved in some way, like this is stressing the timer in some new >>> yet untested way. >>> >>> Has anyone else seen problems with this or is it only ux500? >>> >>> I'm looking closer at it but feel a bit clueless... >> >> >> If you keep the #if 0 and remove the CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP flag, >> does it still crash ? >> > > At-least I observed issue only when I am using hardware broadcast timer. > It doesn't hang when I am using hrtimer as broadcast timer in which case > one of the cpu will be not enter deeper idle states that lose timer. > I will rerun on v4.1-rc1 and post the complete log. So the bug here is that cpuidle_enter() enables interrupts, so the assumption about them being not enabled made by tick_broadcast_oneshot_control() is actually not valid. It looks like we need to acquire the clockevents_lock at least in this particular case. Let me see where to put it and I'll send a patch for testing. Rafael