On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 12:14 AM George Kennedy wrote: > > Hello Rafael, > > On 3/4/2021 7:14 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 2:22 AM George Kennedy wrote: > >> Since commit 7fef431be9c9 ("mm/page_alloc: place pages to tail > >> in __free_pages_core()") the following use after free occurs > >> intermittently when acpi tables are accessed. > >> > >> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ibft_init+0x134/0xc49 > >> Read of size 4 at addr ffff8880be453004 by task swapper/0/1 > >> CPU: 3 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc1-7a7fd0d #1 > >> Call Trace: > >> dump_stack+0xf6/0x158 > >> print_address_description.constprop.9+0x41/0x60 > >> kasan_report.cold.14+0x7b/0xd4 > >> __asan_report_load_n_noabort+0xf/0x20 > >> ibft_init+0x134/0xc49 > >> do_one_initcall+0xc4/0x3e0 > >> kernel_init_freeable+0x5af/0x66b > >> kernel_init+0x16/0x1d0 > >> ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 > >> > >> ACPI tables mapped via kmap() do not have their mapped pages > >> reserved and the pages can be "stolen" by the buddy allocator. > >> > > What do you mean by this? >> > The ibft table, for example, is mapped in via acpi_map() and kmap(). The > page for the ibft table is not reserved, so it can end up on the freelist. You appear to be saying that it is not sufficient to kmap() a page in order to use it safely. It is also necessary to reserve it upfront, for example with the help of memblock_reserve(). Is that correct? If so, is there an alternative way to reserve a page frame? > > > >> Use memblock_reserve() to reserve all the ACPI table pages. > > How is this going to help? > If the ibft table page is not reserved, it will end up on the freelist > and potentially be allocated before ibft_init() is called. > > I believe this is the call that causes the ibft table page (in this case > pfn=0xbe453) to end up on the freelist: > > memmap_init_range: size=bd49b, nid=0, zone=1, start_pfn=1000, > zone_end_pfn=100000 David, is commit 7fef431be9c9 related to this and if so, then how? > [ 0.477319] memmap_init_range+0x33b/0x4e2 > [ 0.479053] memmap_init_zone+0x1e0/0x243 > [ 0.485276] free_area_init_node+0xa4e/0xac5 > [ 0.498242] free_area_init+0xf4a/0x107a > [ 0.509958] zone_sizes_init+0xd9/0x111 > [ 0.511731] paging_init+0x4a/0x4c > [ 0.512417] setup_arch+0x14f8/0x1758 > [ 0.519193] start_kernel+0x6c/0x46f > [ 0.519921] x86_64_start_reservations+0x37/0x39 > [ 0.520847] x86_64_start_kernel+0x7b/0x7e > [ 0.521666] secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xb0/0xbb > > > > >> Signed-off-by: George Kennedy > >> --- > >> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 3 +-- > >> drivers/acpi/acpica/tbinstal.c | 4 ++++ > >> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c > >> index d883176..97deea3 100644 > >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c > >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c > >> @@ -1046,6 +1046,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p) > >> cleanup_highmap(); > >> > >> memblock_set_current_limit(ISA_END_ADDRESS); > >> + acpi_boot_table_init(); > > This cannot be moved before the acpi_table_upgrade() invocation AFAICS. > > > > Why exactly do you want to move it? > > Want to make sure there are slots for memblock_reserve() to be able to > reserve the page. Well, that may not require reordering the initialization this way. > >> e820__memblock_setup(); > >> > >> /* > >> @@ -1139,8 +1140,6 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p) > >> /* > >> * Parse the ACPI tables for possible boot-time SMP configuration. > >> */ > >> - acpi_boot_table_init(); > >> - > >> early_acpi_boot_init(); > >> > >> initmem_init(); > >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbinstal.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbinstal.c > >> index 8d1e5b5..4e32b22 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbinstal.c > >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbinstal.c > >> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ > >> *****************************************************************************/ > >> > >> #include > >> +#include > >> #include "accommon.h" > >> #include "actables.h" > >> > >> @@ -58,6 +59,9 @@ > >> new_table_desc->flags, > >> new_table_desc->pointer); > >> > >> + memblock_reserve(new_table_desc->address, > >> + PAGE_ALIGN(new_table_desc->pointer->length)); > >> + > > Why do you want to do this here in the first place? > > If there is a better place to do it, I can move the memblock_reserve() > there. The memblock_reserve() cannot be done from the ibft code - it's > too late - the ibft table page has already ended up on the freelist by > the time ibft_init() is called. I see. > > > > Things like that cannot be done in the ACPICA code in general. > > Can you recommend a better place to do the memblock_reserve() from? Maybe. I need to understand the problem better, though. Thanks!