From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946363Ab3BHMDK (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2013 07:03:10 -0500 Received: from mail-oa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.219.47]:35162 "EHLO mail-oa0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946329Ab3BHMDJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2013 07:03:09 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87pq0bqkod.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> References: <87pq0bqkod.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 20:03:06 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] stop_machine: dequeue work before signal completion From: Hillf Danton To: Namhyung Kim Cc: Rusty Russell , Tejun Heo , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Namhyung On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote: > On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 11:42:43 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: >> As checked with BUG_ON in the case of CPU_UP_PREPARE, we have to dequeue >> work first for further actions, then stopper reaches sane and clear state. > > Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim > Double thanks since I did not add you in the cc list, may bad;( Hillf