From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933356Ab3GPPzZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:55:25 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]:49406 "EHLO mail-ob0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932441Ab3GPPzY (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:55:24 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1373901620-2021-17-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> References: <1373901620-2021-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <1373901620-2021-17-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 23:55:24 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/18] sched: Avoid overloading CPUs on a preferred NUMA node From: Hillf Danton To: Mel Gorman Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Srikar Dronamraju , Ingo Molnar , Andrea Arcangeli , Johannes Weiner , Linux-MM , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > + > +static int task_numa_find_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int nid) > +{ > + int node_cpu = cpumask_first(cpumask_of_node(nid)); [...] > > + /* No harm being optimistic */ > + if (idle_cpu(node_cpu)) > + return node_cpu; > [...] > + for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask_of_node(nid)) { > + dst_load = target_load(cpu, idx); > + > + /* If the CPU is idle, use it */ > + if (!dst_load) > + return dst_cpu; > + Here you want cpu, instead of dst_cpu, I guess. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx174.postini.com [74.125.245.174]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FC886B0034 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:55:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-oa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id n10so1064631oag.28 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:55:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1373901620-2021-17-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> References: <1373901620-2021-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <1373901620-2021-17-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 23:55:24 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/18] sched: Avoid overloading CPUs on a preferred NUMA node From: Hillf Danton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Mel Gorman Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Srikar Dronamraju , Ingo Molnar , Andrea Arcangeli , Johannes Weiner , Linux-MM , LKML On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > + > +static int task_numa_find_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int nid) > +{ > + int node_cpu = cpumask_first(cpumask_of_node(nid)); [...] > > + /* No harm being optimistic */ > + if (idle_cpu(node_cpu)) > + return node_cpu; > [...] > + for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask_of_node(nid)) { > + dst_load = target_load(cpu, idx); > + > + /* If the CPU is idle, use it */ > + if (!dst_load) > + return dst_cpu; > + Here you want cpu, instead of dst_cpu, I guess. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org