From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753290Ab1JJJxu (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 10 Oct 2011 05:53:50 -0400
Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:65367 "EHLO
	mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753097Ab1JJJxt convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 10 Oct 2011 05:53:49 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1318238296.1546.3.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
References: <1317191992-3635-1-git-send-email-jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
	<1317200618.1573.1765.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
	<CAJe_ZhfDk7O_O7LDh7GrpcaPMzQuzs9nBA8BeN0VxG8_Oe93wg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1317295068.1573.1780.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
	<CAGsJ_4y+ageAqg1DQtQJ-g2j6im_e3KdvkcBaDFLz8fUniJpuA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJe_ZhfyTBgH7wqB1HWtkjDNusecTOTZrqyYKF=Lwb9xQAXA3w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGsJ_4x=F41Fbsw9gB3y=Vzyhf8a9yXB=sd6xbxSNUbTAYdjOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJe_Zhd86uqhzRHaA8ci2GHQgz6TadPR5hTuuUKqCWOFJwn6qg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGsJ_4zOUFUkGv_-BB5sqjVZF1gBe-MVJS3Vxmi9Jo4sqYCLAg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJe_Zhc8zdZzse+jutYERec5bKBPqWmq9v0xYrou0x1BSKyCLQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111003161349.GB28287@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<CAJe_ZhfS=4vSS0OiSuNx3S+fW8R4-=khrHtt8suLeHjTFYBVeA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABE8wwsQKF9eTTU_N305hR=G5qW4Rzb7Lo-nHbc9RVYwSJVSVA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1317966346.1573.2252.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
	<CAJe_ZhdFA641AzmEmYaz++iRNYQmrHDFmAWOkrwmR_h2ie176g@mail.gmail.com>
	<1317997177.1573.2275.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
	<CAJe_ZhdSRmQmHOyOSvzyduu1pxR5K3aSd+1fCW2TB36=1ZwUUg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1318229592.1573.2298.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
	<CAJe_ZhcWUjdh-LGuAaDAbSYNYrV5dzsrkpCGCeYo6y38pNac4g@mail.gmail.com>
	<1318238296.1546.3.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:23:46 +0530
Message-ID: <CAJe_ZheDWAeisyOxFVmhWgZCi5qx8QL1_L+YttFrzWxSHyceug@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4] DMAEngine: Define interleaved transfer request api
From: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Cc: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>, Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        DL-SHA-WorkGroupLinux <workgroup.linux@csr.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 10 October 2011 14:48, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 14:46 +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
>> On 10 October 2011 12:23, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > +struct dmaxfer_memcpy_template {
>> > +       dma_addr_t src_start;
>> > +       dma_addr_t dst_start;
>> > +       bool src_inc;
>> > +       bool dst_inc;
>> > +       bool src_sgl;
>> > +       bool dst_sgl;
>> > +       size_t numf;
>> > +       size_t frame_size;
>> > +       struct data_chunk sgl[0];
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > +struct dmaxfer_slave_template {
>> > +       dma_addr_t mem;
>> > +       bool mem_inc;
>> > +       size_t numf;
>> > +       size_t frame_size;
>> > +       struct data_chunk sgl[0];
>> > +};
>> >
>> (1) Please tell how is dmaxfer_slave_template supposed to work on
>>  bi-directional channels?
>>  Keeping in mind, dma_slave_config.direction is marked to go away
>>  in future.
> I didn't use dma_slave_config.direction. There is direction field in
> corresponding prepare function.
>
ok but why not reduce 1 argument from api and embed that as
the transfer's property in dmaxfer_slave_template, as I did ?

>>
>> (2)
>>   * slave_template.mem  <=>  memcpy_template.src_start
>>   * slave_template.mem_inc  <=>  memcpy_template.src_inc
>>
>>  So essentially
>>   memcpy_template  :=  slave_template + src/dst_sgl + dst_start + dst_inc
>>
>>  Even after this separation, there is nothing slave specific in
>> dmaxfer_slave_template. The slave client still needs DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG
>> to specify slave parameters of the transfer.
>>  You only save a few bytes in a _copy_ of memcpy_template.
> Yes DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG is always required, this attempt was not aimed to
> remove that, but I would be interested in it :)
>
Sorry then I don't see this "ambiguity"(if there really is any) removal worth
adding an extra prepare when we already have 10 of them.