From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3FEC433E0 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 07:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A6D2073E for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 07:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=szeredi.hu header.i=@szeredi.hu header.b="TfaRUWxg" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726389AbgHJHaA (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 03:30:00 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47684 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725846AbgHJHaA (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 03:30:00 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x642.google.com (mail-ej1-x642.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::642]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9710CC061756 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 00:29:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x642.google.com with SMTP id bo3so8318287ejb.11 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 00:29:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=szeredi.hu; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=43SZmp+vV8Sn7GE9PjnhjxxvuNGsA7FckBZzSlZ2a3A=; b=TfaRUWxgqzFbKktIb4Hqt920WExOCG8A/B8G6G3gHeQdfzhyhPlBj3W4n4wmXPXo1h H3SXSQKn6gjCRj/BO/qLLXhzfMro01CW6pGmfkXR1hG/J0BdHRaNCAoaEamtlVc5Ix0p j6FQdh1QoUTYwtEnyVXcm96qmYLTqaCg0ZJ2U= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=43SZmp+vV8Sn7GE9PjnhjxxvuNGsA7FckBZzSlZ2a3A=; b=m5keCF1Z3F3JUq/Pq6XQWFnzzd+2iQxGkMCZg7THAC7Wy9mCO2vpdmsF3IodMm2VXj oaTUeJePJdz5YbAsyBlNWvNV4NYnLYSaHzHAV9XQclR5JjQMrK2L7+IWIE2S9/T/QB8M GuqcF9Ud5Xb18JQ1BTeIcMxwV7tlnP7kd0G/X9CmwQPWz0TomZkql7qnzSa7kpaWYHYp ywYZKqr+0L6I4iAccj4ZFISqGDamlwaRZnlvpG8QH7o9WEnUV2u5+iKFaq3L8nQqK/4e 0GaEWP47lZ5d6SANAk3WlNqc0oyXC9ypP91y8SPY9DxUFk24rNbXUafE7q1Hg9hlMk/e p2Zw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533whEUD7mO9K/iNP3NH8aLxHwg6N7H9tggHelF/nYcBQycD7+8E iqENN3nv9OCnM0eoM7AkjGlfbpNGs9vk0Ru7jD2L8w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyciQYT53K7IaRz/5fZqD7hYIYr+Hh6aU/eSXECWt4BwXLBhbw9V/kG4kM7Be3fj25NOBPcRN9OluwZ2eziDe8= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4e4f:: with SMTP id g15mr5805547ejw.443.1597044598271; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 00:29:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200807195526.426056-1-vgoyal@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200807195526.426056-1-vgoyal@redhat.com> From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:29:47 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/20] virtiofs: Add DAX support To: Vivek Goyal Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtio-fs-list , Stefan Hajnoczi , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 9:55 PM Vivek Goyal wrote: > > Most of the changes are limited to fuse/virtiofs. There are couple > of changes needed in generic dax infrastructure and couple of changes > in virtio to be able to access shared memory region. So what's the plan for merging the different subsystems? I can take all that into the fuse tree, but would need ACKs from the respective maintainers. Thanks, Miklos From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=szeredi.hu; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=43SZmp+vV8Sn7GE9PjnhjxxvuNGsA7FckBZzSlZ2a3A=; b=TfaRUWxgqzFbKktIb4Hqt920WExOCG8A/B8G6G3gHeQdfzhyhPlBj3W4n4wmXPXo1h H3SXSQKn6gjCRj/BO/qLLXhzfMro01CW6pGmfkXR1hG/J0BdHRaNCAoaEamtlVc5Ix0p j6FQdh1QoUTYwtEnyVXcm96qmYLTqaCg0ZJ2U= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200807195526.426056-1-vgoyal@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200807195526.426056-1-vgoyal@redhat.com> From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:29:47 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v2 00/20] virtiofs: Add DAX support List-Id: Development discussions about virtio-fs List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Vivek Goyal Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, virtio-fs-list , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 9:55 PM Vivek Goyal wrote: > > Most of the changes are limited to fuse/virtiofs. There are couple > of changes needed in generic dax infrastructure and couple of changes > in virtio to be able to access shared memory region. So what's the plan for merging the different subsystems? I can take all that into the fuse tree, but would need ACKs from the respective maintainers. Thanks, Miklos