From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Subject: Re: overlayfs access checks on underlying layers
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 16:39:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJfpeguJoEOEjQs4ZpJQaJXF-xCnevUApzNobwmqNX27KQ4vHQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJfpegs9JjkXguemL4qSiBvRP6Dnut-D+nJo-oLFXkfCL1Egvw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJfpegvfqx+0D32n1h2X7oj5d1mZWiLTcSSGpBnD+ba7AKzPyA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181127210542.GA2599@redhat.com> <CAJfpegtQGM2z9TOt3DWwd39fC60cQknsC4vNnj7YimVEubRzUg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181128170302.GA12405@redhat.com> <377b7d4f-eb1d-c281-5c67-8ab6de77c881@tycho.nsa.gov>
 <CAJfpegtNhcWD0VWy6LPtoDtQBfPu4x5iFsB053UMCidj6oMsuw@mail.gmail.com>
 <26bce3be-49c2-cdd8-af03-1a78d0f268ae@tycho.nsa.gov> <CAJfpeguL9xOh9Eq8LOP=ddJ4YD6nbp2UY6e2AYDVoHeCLuVhZA@mail.gmail.com>
 <6b125e8e-413f-f8e6-c7ae-50f7235c8960@tycho.nsa.gov> <CAJfpegv6y56k1-Tewu-Pu3x1W75LL6qYB6Hb6=n+2BJoNfEigA@mail.gmail.com>
 <c993dba4-5129-7f04-2724-a82a1f1cafa3@tycho.nsa.gov> <f84bbe0b-f4c1-50e0-8c84-a6589154b3ae@tycho.nsa.gov>
 <CAJfpegtBDTMbmKd6eDxRmtSJjGN6CnpGK_QPNSsxjkOoeu=1pQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <4c20a261-5ce1-f0a2-8d40-c6032a023216@tycho.nsa.gov> <CAJfpegujwNpWL5Eujrb+=EQF8OMOkO03yq8ZZSkfhFfwQvhGKQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <6feb656e-b1e3-5839-ce5f-669ae5a55b7f@tycho.nsa.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <6feb656e-b1e3-5839-ce5f-669ae5a55b7f@tycho.nsa.gov>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>, Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@android.com>, Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, overlayfs <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
List-Id: linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 4:32 PM Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> wrote:

> Ok, I concede the point.  Not sure what that means though for v4.20.

I have the revert queued up for v4.20 as that's the safest.

Don't let that stop the discussion, though, I'd especially like to
hear the arguments from the Android side.

Thanks,
Miklos