All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
To: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
	Fox Chen <foxhlchen@gmail.com>,
	Brice Goglin <brice.goglin@gmail.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Rick Lindsley <ricklind@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/7] kernfs: add a revision to identify directory node changes
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 14:49:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJfpeguzPEy+UAcyT4tcpvYxeTwB+64yxRw8Sh7UBROBuafYdw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <162322859985.361452.14110524195807923374.stgit@web.messagingengine.com>

On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 10:50, Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> wrote:
>
> Add a revision counter to kernfs directory nodes so it can be used
> to detect if a directory node has changed during negative dentry
> revalidation.
>
> There's an assumption that sizeof(unsigned long) <= sizeof(pointer)
> on all architectures and as far as I know that assumption holds.
>
> So adding a revision counter to the struct kernfs_elem_dir variant of
> the kernfs_node type union won't increase the size of the kernfs_node
> struct. This is because struct kernfs_elem_dir is at least
> sizeof(pointer) smaller than the largest union variant. It's tempting
> to make the revision counter a u64 but that would increase the size of
> kernfs_node on archs where sizeof(pointer) is smaller than the revision
> counter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
> ---
>  fs/kernfs/dir.c             |    2 ++
>  fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/kernfs.h      |    5 +++++
>  3 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/kernfs/dir.c b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
> index 33166ec90a112..b3d1bc0f317d0 100644
> --- a/fs/kernfs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
> @@ -372,6 +372,7 @@ static int kernfs_link_sibling(struct kernfs_node *kn)
>         /* successfully added, account subdir number */
>         if (kernfs_type(kn) == KERNFS_DIR)
>                 kn->parent->dir.subdirs++;
> +       kernfs_inc_rev(kn->parent);
>
>         return 0;
>  }
> @@ -394,6 +395,7 @@ static bool kernfs_unlink_sibling(struct kernfs_node *kn)
>
>         if (kernfs_type(kn) == KERNFS_DIR)
>                 kn->parent->dir.subdirs--;
> +       kernfs_inc_rev(kn->parent);
>
>         rb_erase(&kn->rb, &kn->parent->dir.children);
>         RB_CLEAR_NODE(&kn->rb);
> diff --git a/fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h b/fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h
> index ccc3b44f6306f..b4e7579e04799 100644
> --- a/fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h
> +++ b/fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h
> @@ -81,6 +81,29 @@ static inline struct kernfs_node *kernfs_dentry_node(struct dentry *dentry)
>         return d_inode(dentry)->i_private;
>  }
>
> +static inline void kernfs_set_rev(struct kernfs_node *kn,
> +                                 struct dentry *dentry)
> +{
> +       if (kernfs_type(kn) == KERNFS_DIR)
> +               dentry->d_time = kn->dir.rev;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void kernfs_inc_rev(struct kernfs_node *kn)
> +{
> +       if (kernfs_type(kn) == KERNFS_DIR)
> +               kn->dir.rev++;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool kernfs_dir_changed(struct kernfs_node *kn,
> +                                     struct dentry *dentry)
> +{
> +       if (kernfs_type(kn) == KERNFS_DIR) {

Aren't these always be called on a KERNFS_DIR node?

You could just reduce that to a WARN_ON, or remove the conditions
altogether then.

Thanks,
Miklos

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-11 12:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-09  8:49 [PATCH v6 0/7] kernfs: proposed locking and concurrency improvement Ian Kent
2021-06-09  8:49 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] kernfs: move revalidate to be near lookup Ian Kent
2021-06-11 12:45   ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-06-09  8:49 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] kernfs: add a revision to identify directory node changes Ian Kent
2021-06-11 12:49   ` Miklos Szeredi [this message]
2021-06-11 12:56     ` Ian Kent
2021-06-11 13:11       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-11 13:31         ` Ian Kent
2021-06-11 14:05           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-11 14:16             ` Ian Kent
2021-06-09  8:50 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] kernfs: use VFS negative dentry caching Ian Kent
2021-06-11 13:07   ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-06-12  0:47     ` Ian Kent
2021-06-12  1:48       ` Al Viro
2021-06-13  1:16         ` Ian Kent
2021-06-12  0:07   ` Al Viro
2021-06-12  0:43     ` Ian Kent
2021-06-12  1:08       ` Ian Kent
2021-06-12  1:51         ` Al Viro
2021-06-13  1:57           ` Ian Kent
2021-06-09  8:50 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] kernfs: switch kernfs to use an rwsem Ian Kent
2021-06-11 13:10   ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-06-12  1:24   ` Al Viro
2021-06-09  8:51 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] kernfs: use i_lock to protect concurrent inode updates Ian Kent
2021-06-11 13:11   ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-06-12  1:45   ` Al Viro
2021-06-13  1:31     ` Ian Kent
2021-06-14  1:32     ` Ian Kent
2021-06-14  6:52       ` Ian Kent
2021-06-14  7:16         ` Ian Kent
2021-06-09  8:52 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] kernfs: add kernfs_need_inode_refresh() Ian Kent
2021-06-11 13:13   ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-06-09  8:52 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] kernfs: dont call d_splice_alias() under kernfs node lock Ian Kent
2021-06-11 13:14   ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-06-09 10:14 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] kernfs: proposed locking and concurrency improvement Ian Kent

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJfpeguzPEy+UAcyT4tcpvYxeTwB+64yxRw8Sh7UBROBuafYdw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=brice.goglin@gmail.com \
    --cc=cmaiolino@redhat.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=foxhlchen@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=raven@themaw.net \
    --cc=ricklind@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.