All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] tcg/softmmu: Increase size of TLB caches
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:33:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJhHMCBoOGrts1UvNVbC+g6fxLf_9MCYssNQ4nmqiTyzTLFXuQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <efa7f1f6-af37-a06b-10b0-d40be2a502f0@twiddle.net>

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> wrote:
> On 08/29/2017 10:23 AM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>> This patch increases the number of entries cached in the TLB. I went
>> over a few architectures to see if increasing it is problematic. Only
>> armv6 seems to have a limitation that only 8 bits can be used for
>> indexing these entries. For other architectures, the number of TLB
>> entries is increased to a 4K-sized cache. The patch also doubles the
>> number of victim TLB entries.
>>
>> Some statistics collected from a build benchmark for various cache
>> sizes is listed below:
>>
>> | TLB bits\vTLB entires |             8 |            16  |            32 |
>> |                     8 | 952.94(+0.0%) | 929.99(+2.4%)  | 919.02(+3.6%) |
>> |                    10 | 898.92(+5.6%) | 886.13(+7.0%)  | 887.03(+6.9%) |
>> |                    12 | 878.56(+7.8%) | 873.53(+8.3%)* | 875.34(+8.1%) |
>>
>> The best combination for this workload came out to be 12 bits for the
>> TLB and a 16 entry vTLB cache.
>
> This significantly degrades performance of alpha-softmmu.
> It spends about 25% of all cpu time in memset.

What workload does it degrade for? I will try to reproduce and see
which memset is causing this.

-- 
Pranith

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-06  0:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-29 17:23 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] tcg/softmmu: Increase size of TLB caches Pranith Kumar
2017-08-29 17:40 ` Richard Henderson
2017-09-05 21:50 ` Richard Henderson
2017-09-06  0:33   ` Pranith Kumar [this message]
2017-09-06  8:26     ` Richard Henderson
2017-09-06  8:55       ` Alex Bennée

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJhHMCBoOGrts1UvNVbC+g6fxLf_9MCYssNQ4nmqiTyzTLFXuQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.