From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Green Wan Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 22:23:15 +0800 Subject: [PATCH RFT v2 1/4] pci: add common Designware PCIe functions In-Reply-To: References: <20210325144921.1791892-1-narmstrong@baylibre.com> <20210325144921.1791892-2-narmstrong@baylibre.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 7:48 PM Bin Meng wrote: > > Hi Green, > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 5:21 PM Green Wan wrote: > > > > Hi Neil, > > > > I rebased my driver and gave it a try today. Add my tested-by. > > Tested-by: Green Wan > > > > Thanks, > > > > Hi Bin, > > > > Since fu740 support patches include the designware-based driver and > > also in reviewing, do you prefer me to create the patch based on > > Neil's pcie_dw_common.c or create a separated PCIE patch after both > > fu740 and Neil's patches are merged? > > There are two options: > > 1. Go with the current fu740 series with PCIe, but do a follow-up > patch to convert the fu740 PCIe driver against Neil's > 2. Split the PCIe driver out of the fu740 series, and do a follow-up > patch to add the fu740 PCIe driver based on Neil's > Okay, thanks. I'd like to create a fu740 series v4 patch and go with approach 1. And the follow-up patch will be posted afterward soon as well. Regards, Green > I am fine with either approach. > > Regards, > Bin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qv1-f45.google.com (mail-qv1-f45.google.com [209.85.219.45]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.13194.1616768608127700382 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:23:28 -0700 Received: by mail-qv1-f45.google.com with SMTP id 30so2971795qva.9 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:23:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JO3Q1CKChGmMFL1rtMuUcrAlcxCEXoZkXPtzchAMqZo=; b=bZ05uX6KKa3XfdfCXeIZCybh9YkyZT0bAoHcJb//ijNa7RGHsu0Y2ER22KTIO570hk PoKhpDd3loFYsTBxWnAxvptxmv9Vydf1uNAgca7nj8h5v6iPYYJ0LLMQA193Jx3KLJna ey3Bz5Z9VQa8zvsy7XsDKeqNDvj0EU25P4z9p8A1oWSyN5H5LYnryo9TWzNrvJ5VLqTi j+ar17tslINd48c7i3TIp9VPNF4IN6suBzp+sNgIjMPfCcxu4vZGfadrA8rwlZUcTUiB oN9AwdiHNr96GP0m3hAs/jqQZz2jQcRgJa6p0cK+5+Y7J3HoBU4quJiNJVEl7q+FK9fz Wt4w== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210325144921.1791892-1-narmstrong@baylibre.com> <20210325144921.1791892-2-narmstrong@baylibre.com> In-Reply-To: From: Green Wan Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 22:23:15 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT v2 1/4] pci: add common Designware PCIe functions Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" To: Bin Meng Cc: Neil Armstrong , "cc: Lokesh Vutla" , Sekhar Nori , shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, U-Boot Mailing List , u-boot-amlogic@groups.io List-ID: On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 7:48 PM Bin Meng wrote: > > Hi Green, > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 5:21 PM Green Wan wrote: > > > > Hi Neil, > > > > I rebased my driver and gave it a try today. Add my tested-by. > > Tested-by: Green Wan > > > > Thanks, > > > > Hi Bin, > > > > Since fu740 support patches include the designware-based driver and > > also in reviewing, do you prefer me to create the patch based on > > Neil's pcie_dw_common.c or create a separated PCIE patch after both > > fu740 and Neil's patches are merged? > > There are two options: > > 1. Go with the current fu740 series with PCIe, but do a follow-up > patch to convert the fu740 PCIe driver against Neil's > 2. Split the PCIe driver out of the fu740 series, and do a follow-up > patch to add the fu740 PCIe driver based on Neil's > Okay, thanks. I'd like to create a fu740 series v4 patch and go with approach 1. And the follow-up patch will be posted afterward soon as well. Regards, Green > I am fine with either approach. > > Regards, > Bin