From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4232AC4338F for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 22:51:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25FE161139 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 22:51:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231143AbhHXWwi (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Aug 2021 18:52:38 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-f46.google.com ([209.85.218.46]:39684 "EHLO mail-ej1-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229618AbhHXWwh (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Aug 2021 18:52:37 -0400 Received: by mail-ej1-f46.google.com with SMTP id a25so20825395ejv.6 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:51:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hVI/j+d5bNeovTFLYwZefaFwmlRSPhdjz+bgEESnN58=; b=gWDnDwL/Ef7G0J+r+0A4qqg0gjgMV99rI0FHtrHRG9oR/gXFG3JbxeL+LvIhEDe1TU erC4dWFLmdR9Y5+le+yV5tcaZm12bATbdSILUNr5RIJ7aEvkg+vyr1TtbKfnIQkM0aHK 4iuxwx0Blmq5gPMucWRAcIYk5ioTRtFsapsRKwsuFGIFBTvot2HFX23FCAmzk5uyhmcu 56u9iRhZoe3SUU49/TM5huaMeZrEsr/AaXD53K3TjJpxRxjT43qZdQEIoFAkGhEQGgPY jZ8DSZ7vD7BO/C7Ho5FWrvfFmMQwJTWk1NQkD9yMpT7L9AX6GEKiOTrON2DuD8u9HGuW bM1w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530lGdDfKNPJHPg2ye46lSvBxN3nNiC+r5v0pbTVU6pOEPRzvwgV 5/I+pXNrtMJVoCjwU9owlnnKxdplgRWRaJVOvUo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJymfTzewbNLew04yLbIk4zKhj90mIvEgABcoXcnB+ZodTx/l4jhkK1XyTCBKors5JTXBL73Atg/mksZmkHrro0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:31ca:: with SMTP id f10mr44465528ejf.73.1629845511996; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:51:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210730145957.7927-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com> <3181031.RqgVF4sTRC@tjmaciei-mobl5> <4493449.UzBjrsCbmA@tjmaciei-mobl5> In-Reply-To: From: Len Brown Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 18:51:40 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 12/26] x86/fpu/xstate: Use feature disable (XFD) to protect dynamic user state To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Thiago Macieira , "Chang S. Bae" , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , X86 ML , "Brown, Len" , Dave Hansen , "Liu, Jing2" , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 2:09 PM Borislav Petkov wrote: > What relevance does the fact have for userspace whether the kernel > supports XFD or not? Right. If user space needs to know that XFD exists, then we have done something very wrong. -- Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center