Re: [PATCH 1/1] docs/zh_CN: Add sched-capacity translation

[Alex Shi <seakeel@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 12:55 PM yanteng si <siyanteng01@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Tang Yizhou <tangyizhou@huawei.com> 于2021年12月8日周三 12:35写道：
> >
> > On 2021/12/8 11:16, Alex Shi wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 10:57 PM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Alex Shi <seakeel@gmail.com> writes:
> > >>
> > >>> What the result of scripts/checkpatch.pl or make htmldocs say?
> > >>> Let's tame these tools and follow the regluar styles of kernel.
> > >>
> > >> checkpatch knows nothing about different languages, and "make htmldocs"
> > >> doesn't do that sort of stylistic checking.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the info!
> > >
> > >>
> > >> I don't know enough (i.e. anything :) to have an opinion on the best
> > >> length for lines of Chinese text.  Surely there must be some conventions
> > >> out there?
> > >
> > > The only reason I know is to remove extra spaces char in 'rendered
> > > documentation'
> > > which is generated by line break. For this purpose, 40 or 60 line chars limit
> > > can't fulfill it obviously.
> > >
> > > Yizhou's suggestion has no line break unless a punctuation hitted, so the
> > > space will happen with the punctuation.   This makes the rendered document look
> > > good, but will lead to toooo long and never alignment lines in the
> > > source document.
> > > It looks like we have no good way to resolve this issue by style
> > > change. Also the '60'
> > > number seems an arbitrary number? If we have to relief this problem from coding
> > > style change, why not follow the new rule after checkpatch's change:
> > > from 80 to 100,
> > > let's say about 50 Chinese chars plus breaking after a meaningful Chinese word?
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> > Now I prefer 50 Chinese chars plus breaking after a meaningful Chinese word.
> All guys:
>
> ref <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8550112/prevent-browser-converting-n-between-lines-into-space-for-chinese-characters>

Nice finding!

>
> I have tested that firefox has no space problem. Looks like some
> browser issues, But I still think it's because rst didn't consider
> Chinese support when it was originally designed.
>
> I'm sure there are many ways to solve the space problem elegantly, but
> changing the document source code is definitely not one of them.

Right.

Just since checkpatch has changed, so let's move on...
And of cause, 40 chars width is also acceptable if someone like it.

Thanks
Alex