From: Sergio Correia <lists@uece.net> To: Mohammed Shafi <shafi.wireless@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Leun <lkml20120218@newton.leun.net>, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>, casteyde.christian@free.fr, Kelly Anderson <kelly@silka.with-linux.com>, "ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>, linux-wireless Mailing List <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] 3.3.1 ath9k regression) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 04:45:19 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAJyhjX0jCjRyorUYEf=FXzo=AfjMy3anONSdnZctFWfQ0J1NUQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAD2nsn3-C8ZLmUpTDeA6HuPr-+=V5KkPJb6h5e7ZJsGi4v9p0g@mail.gmail.com> Hello Mohammed, On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Mohammed Shafi <shafi.wireless@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Michael Leun > <lkml20120218@newton.leun.net> wrote: >> After an suspend to disk / resume cycle (in kernel suspend to disk, >> openSuSE) with 3.4-rc2 my ath9k wireless does not ping >> anymore. >> >> Output of iwconfig wlan0 looks just as usual (associated to AP). >> >> iwconfig wlan0 essid <myssid> fixes this (causes an >> deauthenticate/authenticate with AP) - then connectivity is there again. >> >> Guess what: "Of course" does not happen when reverting >> c1afdaff90538ef085b756454f12b29575411214 ath9k: fix going to full-sleep >> on PS idle. >> >> So, in my opinion it should be seriously considered to revert that patch >> until it is fully understood what is going on and why. > > please try with the attached patch to see if it helps. > with your patch applied on a 3.3 kernel, nothing seems to change here (AR9285 PCI express): if the card goes through the suspend/resume cycle, or if I disable/re-enabled the wireless networking on the network manager, I get the following messages: [ 62.931045] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready [ 65.770425] wlan0: authenticate with 00:26:44:68:e0:6f (try 1) [ 65.967949] wlan0: authenticate with 00:26:44:68:e0:6f (try 2) [ 66.167722] wlan0: authenticate with 00:26:44:68:e0:6f (try 3) [ 66.367504] wlan0: authentication with 00:26:44:68:e0:6f timed out if I unload/reload the ath9k module, it works again, though: [ 88.657560] ath9k: Driver unloaded [ 88.714713] ath: EEPROM regdomain: 0x60 [ 88.714715] ath: EEPROM indicates we should expect a direct regpair map [ 88.714718] ath: Country alpha2 being used: 00 [ 88.714720] ath: Regpair used: 0x60 [ 88.716415] ieee80211 phy1: Selected rate control algorithm 'ath9k_rate_control' [ 88.716933] Registered led device: ath9k-phy1 [ 88.716948] ieee80211 phy1: Atheros AR9285 Rev:2 mem=0xffffc90005960000, irq=17 [ 88.735253] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready [ 91.568727] wlan0: authenticate with 00:26:44:68:e0:6f (try 1) [ 91.572181] wlan0: authenticated [ 91.593796] wlan0: associate with 00:26:44:68:e0:6f (try 1) [ 91.598115] wlan0: RX AssocResp from 00:26:44:68:e0:6f (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=2) [ 91.598119] wlan0: associated [ 91.598122] wlan0: moving STA 00:26:44:68:e0:6f to state 1 [ 91.598124] wlan0: moving STA 00:26:44:68:e0:6f to state 2 [ 91.598775] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready [ 91.611432] wlan0: moving STA 00:26:44:68:e0:6f to state 3 thanks, sergio >> >> It may look theoretically correct (I've no knowledge that would enable >> me assess that), but it seems to have caused 3 more or less different >> problems to various people. >> >> -- >> MfG, >> >> Michael Leun >> > > > > -- > thanks, > shafi
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sergio Correia <lists@uece.net> To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org Subject: [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: 3.3.1 ath9k regression) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 04:45:19 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAJyhjX0jCjRyorUYEf=FXzo=AfjMy3anONSdnZctFWfQ0J1NUQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAD2nsn3-C8ZLmUpTDeA6HuPr-+=V5KkPJb6h5e7ZJsGi4v9p0g@mail.gmail.com> Hello Mohammed, On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Mohammed Shafi <shafi.wireless@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Michael Leun > <lkml20120218@newton.leun.net> wrote: >> After an suspend to disk / resume cycle (in kernel suspend to disk, >> openSuSE) with 3.4-rc2 my ath9k wireless does not ping >> anymore. >> >> Output of iwconfig wlan0 looks just as usual (associated to AP). >> >> iwconfig wlan0 essid <myssid> fixes this (causes an >> deauthenticate/authenticate with AP) - then connectivity is there again. >> >> Guess what: "Of course" does not happen when reverting >> c1afdaff90538ef085b756454f12b29575411214 ath9k: fix going to full-sleep >> on PS idle. >> >> So, in my opinion it should be seriously considered to revert that patch >> until it is fully understood what is going on and why. > > please try with the attached patch to see if it helps. > with your patch applied on a 3.3 kernel, nothing seems to change here (AR9285 PCI express): if the card goes through the suspend/resume cycle, or if I disable/re-enabled the wireless networking on the network manager, I get the following messages: [ 62.931045] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready [ 65.770425] wlan0: authenticate with 00:26:44:68:e0:6f (try 1) [ 65.967949] wlan0: authenticate with 00:26:44:68:e0:6f (try 2) [ 66.167722] wlan0: authenticate with 00:26:44:68:e0:6f (try 3) [ 66.367504] wlan0: authentication with 00:26:44:68:e0:6f timed out if I unload/reload the ath9k module, it works again, though: [ 88.657560] ath9k: Driver unloaded [ 88.714713] ath: EEPROM regdomain: 0x60 [ 88.714715] ath: EEPROM indicates we should expect a direct regpair map [ 88.714718] ath: Country alpha2 being used: 00 [ 88.714720] ath: Regpair used: 0x60 [ 88.716415] ieee80211 phy1: Selected rate control algorithm 'ath9k_rate_control' [ 88.716933] Registered led device: ath9k-phy1 [ 88.716948] ieee80211 phy1: Atheros AR9285 Rev:2 mem=0xffffc90005960000, irq=17 [ 88.735253] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready [ 91.568727] wlan0: authenticate with 00:26:44:68:e0:6f (try 1) [ 91.572181] wlan0: authenticated [ 91.593796] wlan0: associate with 00:26:44:68:e0:6f (try 1) [ 91.598115] wlan0: RX AssocResp from 00:26:44:68:e0:6f (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=2) [ 91.598119] wlan0: associated [ 91.598122] wlan0: moving STA 00:26:44:68:e0:6f to state 1 [ 91.598124] wlan0: moving STA 00:26:44:68:e0:6f to state 2 [ 91.598775] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready [ 91.611432] wlan0: moving STA 00:26:44:68:e0:6f to state 3 thanks, sergio >> >> It may look theoretically correct (I've no knowledge that would enable >> me assess that), but it seems to have caused 3 more or less different >> problems to various people. >> >> -- >> MfG, >> >> Michael Leun >> > > > > -- > thanks, > shafi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-09 8:45 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-04-03 5:46 3.3.1 ath9k regression Kelly Anderson 2012-04-03 6:01 ` Ben Greear 2012-04-03 6:01 ` [ath9k-devel] " Ben Greear 2012-04-03 6:26 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-03 6:26 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-03 6:49 ` Kelly Anderson 2012-04-03 6:49 ` Kelly Anderson 2012-04-03 7:16 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-03 7:16 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-03 7:46 ` Kelly Anderson 2012-04-03 7:46 ` Kelly Anderson 2012-04-03 7:52 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-03 7:52 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-03 8:04 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-03 8:04 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-03 8:38 ` Kelly Anderson 2012-04-03 8:38 ` Kelly Anderson 2012-04-03 18:03 ` Michael Leun 2012-04-03 18:03 ` Michael Leun 2012-04-04 7:29 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-04 7:29 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-04 15:03 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-04 15:03 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-04 21:51 ` Michael Leun 2012-04-04 21:51 ` Michael Leun 2012-04-05 6:16 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-05 6:16 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-05 13:53 ` Michael Leun 2012-04-05 13:53 ` Michael Leun 2012-04-05 18:25 ` Ben Greear 2012-04-05 18:25 ` Ben Greear 2012-04-06 5:11 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-06 5:11 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-06 20:31 ` Ben Greear 2012-04-06 20:31 ` Ben Greear 2012-04-08 23:08 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] 3.3.1 ath9k regression) Michael Leun 2012-04-08 23:08 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Michael Leun 2012-04-09 6:28 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-09 6:28 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-09 8:45 ` Sergio Correia [this message] 2012-04-09 8:45 ` Sergio Correia 2012-04-09 10:25 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Michael Leun 2012-04-09 10:25 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Michael Leun 2012-04-09 14:03 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Michael Leun 2012-04-09 14:03 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Michael Leun 2012-04-09 14:22 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-09 14:22 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-09 15:29 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Michael Leun 2012-04-09 15:29 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Michael Leun 2012-04-10 5:48 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-10 5:48 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-10 5:55 ` Peter Stuge 2012-04-10 10:05 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-10 10:05 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-12 13:46 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Felix Fietkau 2012-04-12 13:46 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Felix Fietkau 2012-04-12 13:58 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-12 13:58 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-12 15:35 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Michael Leun 2012-04-12 15:35 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Michael Leun 2012-04-12 18:11 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Felix Fietkau 2012-04-12 18:11 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Felix Fietkau 2012-04-12 19:28 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Sergio Correia 2012-04-12 19:28 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Sergio Correia 2012-04-14 21:15 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-14 21:15 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Felipe Contreras 2012-04-12 22:01 ` 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: [ath9k-devel] " Michael Leun 2012-04-12 22:01 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: " Michael Leun 2012-04-09 19:12 ` Sujith Manoharan 2012-04-09 19:12 ` Sujith Manoharan 2012-04-09 21:21 ` Michael Leun 2012-04-09 21:21 ` Michael Leun 2012-04-09 6:52 ` [ath9k-devel] 3.3.1 ath9k regression Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-09 6:52 ` Mohammed Shafi 2012-04-04 10:40 ` Mantas M.
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to='CAJyhjX0jCjRyorUYEf=FXzo=AfjMy3anONSdnZctFWfQ0J1NUQ@mail.gmail.com' \ --to=lists@uece.net \ --cc=ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net \ --cc=casteyde.christian@free.fr \ --cc=greearb@candelatech.com \ --cc=kelly@silka.with-linux.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lkml20120218@newton.leun.net \ --cc=nbd@openwrt.org \ --cc=shafi.wireless@gmail.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.