From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Eddy_Petri=C8=99or?= Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 17:22:40 +0300 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] serial: Introduce linflex uart support In-Reply-To: References: <1459642206-20101-1-git-send-email-eddy.petrisor@gmail.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de (- Eric, he left the company a little after he contributed to the linflex driver, so he's email is no longer valid) Pe 4 apr. 2016 6:22 a.m., "Bin Meng" a scris: > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:10 AM, Eddy Petri?or wrote: > > From: Stoica Cosmin-Stefan > > > > The Linflex module is integrated on some NXP automotive SoCs part of the former > > Freescale portfolio, like S32V234, an [..] > > +static void linflex_serial_putc(const char c) > > +{ > > + if (c == '\n') > > + serial_putc('\r'); > > Please remove this \n \r handling. I will and retest, but without it we saw in the past the console not behaving correctly. [..] > > -- > > You should really start creating DM serial driver. Non-DM serial > driver is not going to be accepted. I see. Does that imply also SPL support? Our current vendor branch has no SPL support and we had no real need for it. On the other hand it is entirely possible I am misunderstanding what/if the SPL would benefit us. Eddy