From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 8CBDAE00B8D; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 07:57:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.213.67 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-vk0-f67.google.com (mail-vk0-f67.google.com [209.85.213.67]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3EA2E00529 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 07:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vk0-f67.google.com with SMTP id b16so1550837vka.5 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 07:57:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gherzan-ro.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=05z5vGqhoQHIzjgtuR6kvVqrxwPCW8mxp8qcfq/BBIE=; b=z6fagsVzo7JdjAcBvZdScoNHdxLeFayD/nM2YUx0HkH0MSpViH0pdQSiqAklFiEcIt bqkghxj31nog8m2O10VgJ27rjwwGJEIfGKSFqAZNHX10BsnJxYjLPuWhhQOSEasJAYYt d3lbiKVf2SSQ543TS3s3nLS24C3lQKPbn9+0a6hu7kVfnFrzmn4lZe8IzlBqmmZAvXnq OIH1RjLDJprLZKzJDAV5kIT6d4B82d3cXKj6FW6LG7gus3FPfPLB98Wp3wtqrZkVTOMV bz5AytA8V/HIyJ7o6M08PnkUScCyjBUcjD+6YeoLVailnkuYliyGa+L/+LOEyNa9in8O M4Cw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=05z5vGqhoQHIzjgtuR6kvVqrxwPCW8mxp8qcfq/BBIE=; b=fG4xXhOL4c6YFxVVd704TJ78gYL2m385wX2Ll3UQkzXJlOW6ismUuyQrd4HA3urNXB Ebozz+BfIex8rlOamH8HM/AvI5J7QONFhxDstNmHtbK9TRxUGWi2cFgjBLDHPtznm4f1 db2z5SZMwMWEnMt+W846Dmr2nDqjIpb1q95P5kPQ8aoXq5m72GFvFzEGGKziyHn62f1P jQaQcmS9TK9Cv2qxXTetm+y6612sVnhli1NM5rwp87+dv3IYDnjwBmPXoQGhHQglsfRi GLwG4uxnOVsEcFKutbJHjVhB2Lj/2EaAbgDEhDGBC6KPyQhGTyzKrF/5xvDk4Bxr5xYy XBGg== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7FLfZIGQ5jziCucSeHGefrJGSkAc7r9d6HC1GznaYQUpaR9p4jL G8GgashJRJS45JDoL+o/vkTbkq7uEOHrGrfmirXKAA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49RScw5Tw1Bh8Gu6a+zGBELSxg6ety7PJcrNPXlSwDTsHjztLWX3zFulg7X1e6UaMv5X1NLcG6QwMyXjGmO9aI= X-Received: by 10.31.55.11 with SMTP id e11mr2486062vka.192.1522249024348; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 07:57:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.176.96.145 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 07:56:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [90.152.4.98] In-Reply-To: References: From: Andrei Gherzan Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:56:23 +0100 Message-ID: To: Paul Barker Cc: Yocto discussion list Subject: Re: [meta-raspberrypi] raspberrypi3 model B+ not booting X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 14:57:06 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114410a05b3bc405687a3857" --001a114410a05b3bc405687a3857 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > Hi guys, > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 2:40 PM, Paul Barker > wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 1:41 PM, M=C3=A5ns Zigher >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Thanks I will do that. But I have other layers that depend on the rock= o >> of >> > meta-raspberrypi so I believe I will have to use the rocko at some >> point but >> > for testing I will try Morty. What is the reason for using Morty do yo= u >> > know? Is rocko unstable? >> > >> >> Yea, we need to get this fixed in rocko. My test device for >> raspberrypi3 is a Model B v1.2, not a B+ so you may have to help us >> out with testing here. >> >> Could you try out core-image-base built from master with just the >> required layers? If that works then a kernel/firmware backport is >> likely what's needed. >> >> > Today I will have 3b+ support PR to master. Afterwards we can start > backporting things as needed. I'm currently only interested in rocko but = if > other people are willing to do it, we can PR stuff in older versions too. > > https://github.com/agherzan/meta-raspberrypi/pull/215 I tested this PR using rocko + meta-rpi master on rpi3b and rpi3b+. Boots ok, wifi connectivity tested with NM and bluetooth pair with bluetoothctl. -- Andrei Gherzan --001a114410a05b3bc405687a3857 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On W= ed, Mar 28, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Andrei Gherzan <andrei@gherzan.ro> wrote:
Hi guys,

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 2:40 PM, Paul Barker <pbarker@to= ganlabs.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 1:41 PM, M=C3=A5ns Zigher <mans.zigher@gmail.c= om> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks I will do that. But I have other layers that depen= d on the rocko of
> meta-raspberrypi so I believe I will have to use the rocko at some poi= nt but
> for testing I will try Morty. What is the reason for using Morty do yo= u
> know? Is rocko unstable?
>

Yea, we need to get this fixed in rocko. My test device for
raspberrypi3 is a Model B v1.2, not a B+ so you may have to help us
out with testing here.

Could you try out core-image-base built from master with just the
required layers? If that works then a kernel/firmware backport is
likely what's needed.


= Today I will have 3b+ support PR to master. Afterwards we can start backpor= ting things as needed. I'm currently only interested in rocko but if ot= her people are willing to do it, we can PR stuff in older versions too.



I te= sted this PR using rocko + meta-rpi master on rpi3b and rpi3b+. Boots ok, w= ifi connectivity tested with NM and bluetooth pair with bluetoothctl.
=

--
Andrei Gherzan


--001a114410a05b3bc405687a3857--