From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753793AbbERJ24 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 18 May 2015 05:28:56 -0400
Received: from mail-qk0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169]:36342 "EHLO
	mail-qk0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753173AbbERJ2r (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 18 May 2015 05:28:47 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150517055551.GB17002@gmail.com>
References: <20150410121808.GA19918@gmail.com> <tip-4874fe1eeb40b403a8c9d0ddeb4d166cab3f37ba@git.kernel.org>
 <CA+55aFywCXk083w78cQGbRKh-ERLtE8v9PZhqxaHcyHJxSNsFQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150517055551.GB17002@gmail.com>
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 11:28:25 +0200
Message-ID: <CAK1hOcO1nWFsOrubEDO0wU=+Dubk3tx1UFB-Za+W0Nxd=V1i7g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/asm] x86: Pack function addresses tightly as well
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>, Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@hp.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
        Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>,
        "linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org" 
	<linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>      With function packing, they compress into:
>
>         ffffffff817f2458 T _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
>         ffffffff817f2463 T _raw_read_unlock_irqrestore

So   _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore is only 11 bytes long?

Sounds like it should have been inlined.
Is this with CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINES=y ?