From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 7755EE009B3; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:28:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.213.175 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (vm.rod25[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-ig0-f175.google.com (mail-ig0-f175.google.com [209.85.213.175]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504DBE0087F for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:28:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iggf3 with SMTP id f3so326597igg.1 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:28:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=EPKV/LtYh9mTHlcFCfilbkxD3Ys9yVDBDpReppQJq2o=; b=nR78e/DfY2v7pz3XSt66vPMBq7sM3XVZQYXBP73en6vqtveMziv847Mv72ucTlhW8E uZJ86Whgm6AxV5D4v1XWsKHgw/4O5z7GEb+jE2s+rLm7niw56DlrRXpsFkim77cQst2L SuhfnYEhU9CYHStrzhZffoO7ZLQhgE2oXkC5qQ0lmCzypyd934yjkxFvp8yqiMAzfsFl BdebxzMdVdhlC2/I/vWVt0okMODhmfdDbAEgyEGnc6LZNzSc9+aJgfn71WguCGh5dCcX n4Xd3jS7KFCp85FuYSwHOYx4e+e16TzrIRahOFsAZ5XIsVQNtQzn6EBqAwh/ltyGjRpc GHpQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.166.72 with SMTP id p69mr16823885ioe.65.1437683323325; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:28:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.141.228 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:28:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3048124.JhGOlONExd@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <55AE8445.60302@linux.intel.com> <3048124.JhGOlONExd@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:28:43 -0500 Message-ID: From: Victor Rodriguez To: Paul Eggleton Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" , OpenEmbedded Devel List , Gary Thomas Subject: Re: [oe] Question about IMAGE_INSTALL_append and CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 20:28:48 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Tuesday 21 July 2015 14:51:55 Victor Rodriguez wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Leonardo Sandoval >> >> wrote: >> > On 07/21/2015 10:45 AM, Victor Rodriguez wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: >> >>> On 2015-07-21 09:26, Victor Rodriguez wrote: >> >>>> Hi team >> >>>> >> >>>> I have a question , according to documentation there is a difference >> >>>> between >> >>>> >> >>>> IMAGE_INSTALL_append >> >>>> >> >>>> and >> >>>> >> >>>> CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL >> >>>> >> >>>> Specifies the list of packages to be added to the image. You should >> >>>> only set this variable in the local.conf configuration file found in >> >>>> the Build Directory. >> >>>> >> >>>> When I use the second one and try to build a core-image-minimal-xfce >> >>>> bitbake does not install what I wanted in my image . I had a really >> >>>> hard time few weekends ago because of this. >> >>>> >> >>>> I wonder If I am missing something or if this is a bug >> >>> >> >>> The core-image-minimal-xfce recipe does not "play nice" with >> >>> the core-image class and is not respecting CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL. >> >>> >> >>> I think this should be filed as a bug (and feel free to suggest a patch) >> >>> >> >>> BTW, this question should really be on the OpenEmbedded development >> >>> list. >> >> >> >> Thanks Gary >> >> >> >> I will submit the BUG , do you know the Bugzila where I should submit it >> >> ? >> > >> > Victor, you can file a bug at https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org >> >> I think we have one already >> >> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7616 > > That's not the right bug. > > If the suggestion is that core-image-minimal-xfce needs to be fixed, that's not > a bug we would track in the Yocto Project bugzilla (since the Yocto Project is > not actively involved in maintaining meta-xfce). > > Cheers, > Paul Hi Paul Where can I track this ? > -- > > Paul Eggleton > Intel Open Source Technology Centre From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-f172.google.com (mail-ig0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C683B7623E for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 20:28:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igr7 with SMTP id 7so364703igr.0 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:28:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=EPKV/LtYh9mTHlcFCfilbkxD3Ys9yVDBDpReppQJq2o=; b=nR78e/DfY2v7pz3XSt66vPMBq7sM3XVZQYXBP73en6vqtveMziv847Mv72ucTlhW8E uZJ86Whgm6AxV5D4v1XWsKHgw/4O5z7GEb+jE2s+rLm7niw56DlrRXpsFkim77cQst2L SuhfnYEhU9CYHStrzhZffoO7ZLQhgE2oXkC5qQ0lmCzypyd934yjkxFvp8yqiMAzfsFl BdebxzMdVdhlC2/I/vWVt0okMODhmfdDbAEgyEGnc6LZNzSc9+aJgfn71WguCGh5dCcX n4Xd3jS7KFCp85FuYSwHOYx4e+e16TzrIRahOFsAZ5XIsVQNtQzn6EBqAwh/ltyGjRpc GHpQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.166.72 with SMTP id p69mr16823885ioe.65.1437683323325; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:28:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.141.228 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:28:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3048124.JhGOlONExd@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <55AE8445.60302@linux.intel.com> <3048124.JhGOlONExd@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:28:43 -0500 Message-ID: From: Victor Rodriguez To: Paul Eggleton Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" , OpenEmbedded Devel List , Gary Thomas , Leonardo Sandoval Subject: Re: [yocto] Question about IMAGE_INSTALL_append and CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 20:28:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Tuesday 21 July 2015 14:51:55 Victor Rodriguez wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Leonardo Sandoval >> >> wrote: >> > On 07/21/2015 10:45 AM, Victor Rodriguez wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: >> >>> On 2015-07-21 09:26, Victor Rodriguez wrote: >> >>>> Hi team >> >>>> >> >>>> I have a question , according to documentation there is a difference >> >>>> between >> >>>> >> >>>> IMAGE_INSTALL_append >> >>>> >> >>>> and >> >>>> >> >>>> CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL >> >>>> >> >>>> Specifies the list of packages to be added to the image. You should >> >>>> only set this variable in the local.conf configuration file found in >> >>>> the Build Directory. >> >>>> >> >>>> When I use the second one and try to build a core-image-minimal-xfce >> >>>> bitbake does not install what I wanted in my image . I had a really >> >>>> hard time few weekends ago because of this. >> >>>> >> >>>> I wonder If I am missing something or if this is a bug >> >>> >> >>> The core-image-minimal-xfce recipe does not "play nice" with >> >>> the core-image class and is not respecting CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL. >> >>> >> >>> I think this should be filed as a bug (and feel free to suggest a patch) >> >>> >> >>> BTW, this question should really be on the OpenEmbedded development >> >>> list. >> >> >> >> Thanks Gary >> >> >> >> I will submit the BUG , do you know the Bugzila where I should submit it >> >> ? >> > >> > Victor, you can file a bug at https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org >> >> I think we have one already >> >> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7616 > > That's not the right bug. > > If the suggestion is that core-image-minimal-xfce needs to be fixed, that's not > a bug we would track in the Yocto Project bugzilla (since the Yocto Project is > not actively involved in maintaining meta-xfce). > > Cheers, > Paul Hi Paul Where can I track this ? > -- > > Paul Eggleton > Intel Open Source Technology Centre